140827
Culture. Which one is the TERRORIST?
Daily the
western world is plagued with news items about 'terrorism'.
Politicians
abuse the word maximally, for a boost in popularity thus votes from
the most ignorant punters, and to 'justify' an increase in weapons of
war, for their illusory, cloaking 'war on terror'.
What their
hidden agendas are behind this facade, remains open to speculation.
And open to a zillion online and mainstream media outlets, the
corporate media adding to the 'spin'. For the mass of smaller,
alleged counter-cultural media houses, adding to their troves of
conspiracy theories.
Wars abound
between the most powerful western relio-corporate military-industrial
alliances, namely 'zionism', and a variety of labeled 'enemies', from
the most publicized, Islam, but also from others, usually
anti-capitalist powers, perceived as 'communist', and even just
socialist.
As the western
world's judaic-christian, 'zionist' hegemony has won control of most
of the planet's media, they assume the authority to use the
mainstream western media to spread their own culture as the natural
best, and unquestionably correct culture for the whole planet.
That media is
given over also, as a propaganda medium to also denigrate all other
cultures.
Unfortunately,
the truths regarding the rectitude and veracity, the-good-versus-bad
aspects of each and any culture, but of course those good and bad
traits of the dominant zionist culture, are manipulated, and as
control grows, the truths are reduced to the minimums.
As well, the
remaining 'truths' become less and less factual.
Welcome to
'News-speak'!
So, now, in
2014, the world is being manipulated to the worst degree, by the
mainstream AND alternative media, pushing their own carts, asserting
untruths left, right and centre. The result is the general
degradation of everyone's quality, of the news they receive, and
thus, of their lives.
Few people,
online at least, are able to take a serious, impartial position on
this. Because when they do, the dominant paradigm, zionism, swoops
upon them and does whatever it deems necessary, to eliminate their
position, viewpoint and voice.
So, taking a
position of impartiality, to try assess and broadcast a truly
impartial and obviously alternative viewpoint, I posit that it is now
more than ever, the time for the whole of the species, to reassess
'culture', completely, in the single effort to find the truth or
truths about good versus bad culture.
Where to
start?
Parameters.
What
constitutes a good, if not a perceived 'best' culture?
Immediately
it's obvious this is an enormous and complex task.
Who
contributes? What subcultural aspects have to be considered, and
which don't rate as necessary?
Hmmm? It's
immediately looks like growing to being an unmanageable task.
Does such an
inquiry take the position of being any or all cultures' critic?
Or does one
start by trying to define the best 'qualities' of the whole species,
on a single patch of real estate, which offer and ensure the longest
most sustainable, least aggressive ways, for the greatest possible
number of it's populace?
Does it
consider this from some 'ideal' number, as-in some ideal size of the
population, given the resources, ie., Land?
Or is it more
realistic to start from where the species and it's habitat, the whole
planet, are at present?
First answer
from this think tank, is to this last question.
Start from
what we have now, from what is at hand!
Yuk!
The
disparities are endless, and range in the greatest extremes, it
seems?
From the
“Jain” religious sect in India, who shun even clothing, and
washing the body, out of Respect for the smallest living microbes
that live on and in their own skins, to the maximum-consumption mobs
of the western, 1st world's richest, who consume per head
more than many towns.
Deducing which
of these an inquiry should listen to, and which of all the 7 billion
'individual cultures' in between, adds more reason to just throw the
hands up and become a junkie! Or stoner. Or drunk. Again.
The 1st
thing I do see as correct, is to stay well above religion. At least
all we know of today. Because nowadays there are few which do not
have at least sub-cults working under the same larger name, which are
fanatical and implore that all the others are off the path of
righteousness, and that theirs is the only one true religion.
Sheeesh!?
And, from
experience, modern, western atheism is as often, and also, little
more than lucky egomaniacs who are born into a wealthy enough
culture, as to not need to beg or sleaze up to a religious cult for
their 'daily bread', plus house and an auto and a local coffee shop
to talk their incessant shit to similarly fortuned, spoiled brats.
So the people
an inquiry can seek discussion and impartial answers from is fast
getting pretty small.
Also, because
this 'strange time' we all appear to be living in is so off the Path
of Righteousness and Balanced Thinking, finding contributors who are
so independent of thought to be able to put-in truly Impartial ideas,
is nigh-on impossible.
The one who
initiates this hypothetical inquiry, is really left to his own
resources for any satisfactory answers. At. This. Stage.
Because trying
to ask the world for impartial points of view about this quite large
question – “Which is the Best Culture?” – requires that the
contributors can be Impartial.
And from experience, the cultures predominant today, from the east and west, north and south, all have their own concerns, agendas and needs for survival. And thus, quite naturally, they all, to varying extents, find cause to have some antipathy against most and sometimes all others.
So very few
people are able to make their way through life without having to
condescend by some degree to a large cult.
And this they
ave to spread as far as they can, to gain supporters. Hence, bias,
preferences, bigotry, religion, etc.
Thank Heavens
for SCIENCE!
Of course, the
irony is, that the culture - I put ahead of any conclusion - which is
the worst culture for the prolonged sustainable existence of the
whole species, is the one which has defined the parameters for a
Proper Scientific Inquiry?
But in that,
is another irony.
Because many
of the other cultures which are now in contention if not outright war
against the 'worst' most threatening culture, were not so
dysfunctional as to require the modern scientific methods be
conceived, or defined, to the point of sterile laboratories, to
figure out this final, largest of all conundrums?
Hummpfff?
Therefore,
from that little insight as to the very need for this inquiry, it's
deduced that those cultures which did not need to as much, 'invent'
the modern parameters of the scientific method, must therefore have
been on, or closer to the Righteous Path, than the one which had to
invent science to figure out where it has gone off the path!
So? The best
aspects of the worst culture?
Damn! Because
immediately, one sees the need to separate the benefits of the worst
culture, from the negatives of those same best aspects. Negatives
which do damage, and harm the species' chances of the longest
possible most sustainable culture/s.
For example;
Technology! Great stuff. THIS computer! All the wonderful and
GLOBAL connectivity, comes from the advances in modern warfare
technology.
Plus, we must
consider the harm done to the natural environment by the search and
mining for the modern comm's hi-tech componentry, it's minerals, etc?
Do we include
the damage to everything which modern warfare has done with it's
advanced weapons-of-mass-destruction?
Well, that,
should be a primary consideration, considering they have now reached
the point where a war using the latest most dangerous weapons,
nuclear warheads, could in the worst-case-scenario wipe all life off
Mum Eartha!
And, being
impartial, how much must an inquiry tolerate, forgive and include
religions, which have made possible either via once secretive
inquiries by their own clergy, or from the cults' opponents cause to
take off on their own secretive scientific inquiries?
Many
questions.
For but one
answer?
Damn!
So to get back
to why this came up, we see the world is in something of a downward
spiral, in many fronts. Culture. Food supplies, population,
distribution, religion. Happiness.
WHAAAH? Did
some one mention HAPPINESS???
OK? Getting
back to what prompted this diatribe.
“Terrorism”?
Who classifies one attack on any culture as 'terrorism'?
The people who
support the dominant culture which has control of the media.
Globally, western culture.
Why do Freedom
Fighters target the culture which labels them 'terrorists'?
Because it
threatens their culture.
This could go
on ad-infinitum, and not reach any useful conclusion.
So perhaps the
need is to refer to statistics?
It is known
that the planet is our only one, and that it is under enormous
stress, on a number of fronts.
1. Population,
of the most consumptive species – Humans.
2. Human
Pollution – effecting the natural ecological balance, to the point
of creating dangerous changes to the atmospheric, terrestrial and
marine regenerative systems. Systems the natural world supplies life
with it's basics of oxygen, and other airborne chemicals, water,
minerals enough to sustain the reproductive growth cycles of foods,
animal and vegetable.
3.
Over-consumption of the natural products of these ecological systems,
to the point of disrupting the natural cycles necessary to sustain a
system of supply of the mentioned products. An example being
depletion of fish stocks, on scales never before seen, for human
consumption, [mostly out of sense-or-culture-centred cravings], such
that that assault reduces one or a number of marine species which are
vital to the overall aqua-cultural, thus global ecological balance.
4.
Over-concentration of industry, be-it producing hardware, or food
stocks. Cattle, the prime food stock in question, which is fine, to
a limited size, where cattle originated and evolved in harmony with
the local environment.
But outside of
those locales, cattle and the clearing of forests for them to graze,
are disastrous for the ecosystems they've been introduced to.
5. Another
system of food stock which is doing massive, perhaps terminal damage
to the critical climate and ecological balance, is broad-acre
monocrop 'farming' of such as wheat, corn, barley, and any broad-acre
monocrop like cotton, which has to remove the combined natural
biosphere's beings, insects, small and large animals and fauna that
give and take crucial elements for the natural balance to be
preserved.
6.
Over-production. A product of completely irrational, unrestrained
[being 'ungoverned'!], unthought-out cRapitalist profit-driven
enterprise, leading to perhaps the least Ethical aspect of
profit-based cultural standards, excess waste, excess consumption,
excess consumption of land space, and the eventually-generic or
mass-psychoses that these create.
And out of all
these, I posit, have grown the excessive fundamentalist creeds,
cultures, religions, and fundamentalist counter-creeds,
counter-cultures and counter religions, which only seem to make the
whole debacle more of a debacle.
What! A!
Fuck-up!
'Terrorism'?
Which, of all cultures most terrorizes the most people?
The impartial
inquiry determines, without any more than mere logic and a few known
facts, as put above, that the culture, creed, way of living that most
'terrorizes' the most Human Beings, is the dominant culture of
western, judiac-christian, 'free-market' consumer-capitalism.
Profit-centred enforced consumption upon the masses of powerless
battlers.
'zionism'.
Yet this is
the culture first to demonize any group who sees this plain fact, and
who determines, very often quite correctly, that they must act in
some way to stop this plague of mindless, materialist,
profit-centred, enforced-consumption, anti-nature, pyramid-market
colonialism.
Therefore,
those who stand up for zionism, and increase antipathy for all
cultures which oppose this most-destructive culture of western,
judiac-christian, 'pyramid-market' capitalism, are the terrorists.
They then, ate
who the species needs must silence, bring to court on charges of
committing or seeking to induce others to commit the worst possible
crimes against humanity.
Everyone,
everywhere, can name their own zionist politicians, their own zionist
media, their own zionist corporate executives, their own zionist
religions' clerics, as culpable.
As these, all
have almost maximum influence upon everyone, everywhere, does this
not mean that all of us, everywhere, are also made culpable, merely
because those groups of politics, media, corporations and religion,
have so much power over us, forcing us to partake of the most
criminal culture/s, and as well, make our own personal or collective
Dissent, a crime?
No matter that
Science, Right-mindedness, a summation of all the best aspects of
religion, culture, sustainable living practices, and industry etc.,
makes this case clear, proven and absolutely irrefutable?
So? How best
to begin correcting the forces of culture?
First thing is
to start calling out the media and politicians, corporations and
religions which condemn people and cultures as 'terrorist' because
they go to war against the most evil, most terrorizing culture and
peoples on earth.
How do we most
effectively 'label' these culprits?
That they are
themselves advocates of terrorism, logically they should be labeled
'terrorists'.
But, because
they seem at this stage to have the 'copyright' on the use, albeit
the complete 'abuse' of the term 'terrorism', it might be necessary
to find and use a different word to target the perpetrators of the
most evil form of terrorism?
A moot point,
perhaps?
Words are
powerful weapons, especially, as we see, in the way the corrupted
terrorist zionist mainstream media and politicians so effectively
sway public opinion with mere words.
Are they
actually swaying public opinion?
Or are we all
more, mere victims of their controlled media?
If the zionist
media-cum-political-class does have so much power, are they not as
likely to be broadcasting complete fallacies, not just to sway public
opinion, but by broadcasting false figures on what, public opinion
actually is?
Knowing the
levels these spoiled-rotten, ridiculously wealthy moguls are ready to
descend to without-a-second-thought, merely to keep their preferred
ideology on top of the global pyramid, that last scenario is the most
likely.
One classic
example is when a government spokesperson trumpets that;
“We were
elected by the people of -no-name-nation- to implement these
policies, rahrahrah!”
When rarely do
all the people elect governments in these alleged 'democracies.'
Mostly, in
Australia's case, governments, are elected in or out by the
strangely-consistent average 52/48 percent of the electorate. By a
slim majority.
So unless 100%
of the electorate vote for the government, but less fussy, let's say
by 80%, the government should not say “We were elected by the
people!” Some of the people, yes, but never has a government in a
western democracy been elected into power by 100% of the voters.
Another term
they abuse, is “The people have given us a mandate to bring in our
policies”, etc. For that to happen, again 100% of the people would
need to vote for them. Which never happens.
Yesterday on
Google Conversations, I saw on the OCCUPY
pages a post giving a list of their preferred “TOP 20 Alternative
Media” websites.
I hit it and
bookmarked about six I thought suited my 'media culture' most.
OCCUPY
put it that this is what we all must do, in sourcing our news,
because more are aware that the MSM, mainstream media, can no longer
be trusted to report facts, on the bigger affairs. Indeed, how long
since they COULD be trusted?
OCCUPY
had it that most westerners still use the television news as their
news source. But as TV is so heavily and narrowly controlled, it is
the least trustworthy, in the electronic medium.
With the
growth of the smartphone, and more portable devices to connect to the
internet, more people of course, are using them to get news.
So the
alternative media, as OCCUPY recommends, is more accessible, and with
the spread of dissatisfaction with the quality and
truthfulness-or-NOT of the MSM, more will use the internet as their
source of news.
As well, as
the world spins further out of balance, as much, it must be
emphasized, by the force of the NWO zionist false news we get, more
people are finding they cannot ignore the wars elsewhere and the
various troubles happening, so are finding they too, do look to the
news more.
So it's
logical that they'll possibly start by looking at the easiest
sources, and that's the blobbox in perhaps a majority of loungerooms.
“TELEVISION
– the drug of a nation!
Breeding
ignorance, and feeding radiation!”
Or
something.....
But clearly as
the modern world is all about interaction, between social networks
face-to-face, online and via phones, it's probable that more people
turning to news networks will find contrary info and stories from one
source to the next. And eventually, we might expect, if they are as
smart as their phones, they'll correct their searching and seek out
the best thus most honest – or the most honest thus the best -
reporting services.
That usually
includes realizing why media is so slanted, and that corporate
sponsoring warps news away from truth.
So,
Alternative Media, they have to dig around for, which is not
dependent upon self-interested and entirely corrupt sponsors.
Having watched
OCCUPY start and grow, into being a reasonably large network, and
watching their G+ pages regularly, I think I can say they remain
Credible.
So the
recommended Alternative NEWS Media sites they offer, are the kind
where news-seekers should start, or transfer to, or include in their
news-diet.
As I looked
down the
list, and in the comments was another list of another 13, it
struck me that, therefore, OCCUPY can itself begin it's own media
empire [ha!], with particular subsets of specific topics, from these
they regard as Credible, which 'users' can download their apps for,
to get regular feeds from the subset, or from OCCUPY, giving the user
the briefs and links to items as they come online.
The point
stressed by the post to the G+ OCCUPY pages, was that with more youth
looking for credible news, at-once with more youth – who ARE the
future – carrying some portable online device, both the market and
the need for some sort of Guaranteed-Credible online News medium,
increases to becoming crucial. For the future for the youth.
And, as
today's youth, under-30s say, are the biggest generation to ever
Dissent from the orthodox mainstream culture/s, perhaps because it
takes no high class education to learn that we ARE in the
fastest-changing times [but obviously, for at least the last thousand
years, the young-adult generation were also in 'the
fastest-changing-times', nevertheless], then it's likely that they
are also the generation who can effect the best, most positive
corrections to the planets destructive cultures?
Another
apparently quite effective way to slow and perhaps halt the zionist
rampage, is to be aware of the offending nations, and be up-to-date
as to which 'BARCODES' they are allocated, and which are on their
retail products. Then, when shopping, for anything that has a
barcode, check it's number, and if it's one of the Israeli numbers
[“729” is one, and they now use two others because the ban is
hitting their incomes, so they had to change] DON'T BUY IT. Find a
product to replace it from another country. [I can see that is full
of complexities though, because so much produce is made by
zionist-allied nations, and sooo many corporations are part-owned by
Israeli moguls and shareholders.]
Having no idea
of how interested your average youth, including all nations' youths,
are, in the state of the planet and of the species overall, I also
have no partiality to any one culture or group or nation.
This for good
or for my own ill, leaves me impartial, so rather than being forced
to focus on one destructive culture, I can ponder ethereal, timeless
options, such as this diatribe tries address.
Which culture
is the most dangerous?
The current
dominant culture of western free-market imperialism.
And which is
the best one for the species?
Clearly NOT
the culture which is doing the most harm to everything on Mum Eartha.
The culture of
western free-market imperialism.
So...., to
give an answer to the opening question, it is easy to prove the
dominant western capitalist, judaic-christian culture is the most
serious threat to life on earth.
Therefore
those who defend it most, by insulting the others who stand against
it, are the real terrorists.
So it becomes
our, that-is EVERYONE'S Duty to call them out, and even to begin to
make public allegations as to their terrorism, thus that they must be
arrested, or as near as we can get to bringing them off their
self-righteous pedestals, merely to silence them, to stop them
agitating for impossible-to-justify wars, and inequality.
It is
everyone's Duty to work to have the cultural terrorists - most of our
mainstream pro-zion politicians,and those behind them who sponsor or
threaten them - replaced with minds, and voices who recognize the
general dilemma, but who also have clear and unambiguous answers to
replace these terrorists' criminal propaganda and policies with.
Fabianists and
self-secure pro-western-culture elite and even lesser,
middle-and-upper class folks may protest, for self-evident reasons.
But do they
put forward any better, more impartial and correct views on what
humanity must do, as soon as possible, to stop this evil condemning
of far far less evil cultures and peoples than the defenders of the
most dangerous culture – and peoples - on earth?
Rarely,
because they are in-deep with the personal benefits that most evil
culture gives them. If they are not the most evil of all themselves!
Time the
police arrested the elite.
JUST
DEFIANCE
Brayakooloong
Gunai Indigenous Outlaw
Australia
All
Praise the Immortals!
All
Praise the Warriors who have fallen
Fighting
for a Just World!
Outlaw
REALPolitik
Journalist
Bleck
- Green - Red
Wisdom
- Intelligence - Honor
GLOBAL
Advocating
Cult,
Land,
Tax,
Housing,
Family,
Agricultural,
Drug,
Work,
Education,
Environmental
&
LAND
LAW
REFORM
