This isn't complete, nor comprehensive,
in the issues I go to, that need discussing and explaining.
But, I'm feeling "old", it's
late, I'm tired, and the bottle of Shiraz is room temp, and but 1/4
drunk.
(Approx 1800 words)
160114 Jews are world's largest &
oldest CRIME SYNDICATE
“nation” (n.) c. 1300, from
Old French nacion "birth, rank; descendants, relatives;
country, homeland" (12c.) and directly from Latin nationem
(nominative natio) "birth, origin; breed, stock, kind,
species; race of people, tribe," literally "that
which has been born," from natus, past participle of nasci
"be born" (Old Latin gnasci; see genus). Political sense
has gradually predominated, but earliest English examples inclined
toward the racial meaning "large group of people with common
ancestry."
from Wikpedia;
Nation (from Latin: natio, "people,
tribe, kin, genus, class, flock") is a social concept with no
uncontroversial definition,[1] but that is most commonly used to
designate larger groups or collectives of people with common
characteristics attributed to them—including language, traditions,
customs (mores), habits (habitus), and ethnicity. A nation, by
comparison, is more impersonal, abstract, and overtly political than
an ethnic group. It is a cultural-political community that has become
conscious of its autonomy, unity, and particular interests.[2]
According to Joseph Stalin: "a
nation is not a racial or tribal, but a historically constituted
community of people;" "a nation is not a casual or
ephemeral conglomeration, but a stable community of people"; "a
nation is formed only as a result of lengthy and systematic
intercourse, as a result of people living together generation after
generation"; and, in its entirety: "a nation is a
historically constituted, stable community of people, formed on the
basis of a common language, territory, economic life, and
psychological make-up manifested in a common culture."[3]
So? Is the planet still made up of
“nations” today?
Or has something, some other format,
formula taken control?
Obviously, things are not calm and
comfortable now, if they ever were.
Today, “nations” may still be, on
the surface, “... a historically constituted community of people”
as Joseph Stalin said, but few are controlled by that same
collective.
Governments are run and put in and out
by multinational corporations, which themselves are owned by even
larger, usually little known cabals, global networks of silent
operators, with their hands in many major highly influential
industries and types of instrumentalities.
Is there one biggest group, cabal or
even “race” which is in top of the global syndication of power
and thus of controlling how all things operate?
Many will mock even the suggestion of
this, and scream insults at those who say there is.
Usually, the more any do scream, the
more their screaming suggests that the suspicions have merit.
Israel, and zionism, has huge
departments called, I believe, “hasbara”, for online monitoring
and counter-accusations to cover this.
These hasbara are assigned to counter
and mock, to distract interest away from the basic truth, that the
jewish “race”, or the jewish cult, are the one group which has
worked almost tirelessly for more than a couple of thousand years to
become that leading controller of the whole planet.
In short, the jews are altogether, the
world's largest crime cartel.
It is the natural order of a
semi-intelligent species, on a finite piece of real estate, to have
this occur.
Whether in another situation, some “one
group” could have become so all-powerful, without causing the
carnage and chaos the jewish folks have, is hypothetical, and
pointless asking.
The facts are, they have made it to the
top of the pyramid, and will, by any means try to stay there.
It's obvious to most genuine, serious
and intellectually balanced onlookers, and investigators, that more
problems have resulted from the particular one group's ascent to top
of the pile, than is now healthy for the whole of us.
Indeed, the unavoidable psychoses which
the leading crime gang has across it's own, have gone ballistic, out
of control, and seem all too close to going so far, with the, their
own, prophesied “Armageddon” the finale.
For most of recorded history,
monarchies have held the fort, so to say.
A collective review tends to show that
all-up, there was a general overall balance across cultures and
races, while monarchies sat on thrones and had the usual
bureaucracies running the things outside the palace and castle
estates, etc.
But of course, as often, minorities
could not be tolerated nor catered for, and “democracy” was off
the cards.
It is another rhetorical or
hypothetical question as to whether the planet's population and
natural non-human flora and fauna, but including the human members,
would have eventually gone off the rails as much as we obviously now
have, were any single crime syndicate NOT to have sought and gained
the control of the most productive and destructive species as the
jews now have.
As I wrote in a blog essay, “Amoeba
to Empire to Self-Extermination” (
http://maxearth.blogspot.com.au/2012/12/amoeba-to-empire-to-self-extermination.html
) the same thing, eventually, is how life goes.
Self-extermination of any whole species
and an whole planet's “life”, doesn't depend on any one group
winning total power and in the same leg going totally insane, as I
posit the jewish people, generally, especially those at the very top
of their pile, clearly have done.
But, that, with or not, a single
fanatical cabal, cult, subspecies overpowering the rest, without a
strong upholding of Wisdom in leadership, seems to be the natural
evolution and devolution of “life” in general?
So? “Nations”?
Once, collectives of agreeable yet
differing peoples, knowing basic rules by which to peaceably share
enough of the local resources to not cause grief in any, so not cause
such ideological, political, economic or beliefs' divisions, or
disparities of wealth distribution, to cause civil war.
No more!
“Before”, monarchies allowed
difference, but only so far as would not cause grief and discomfort
in any other or in any more influential group within the borders.
But, even that's more idealistic a view
of the history of nations under monarchic control, surely?
Everywhere, minorities have been
oppressed and exterminated by ruling powers.
Minorities have survived on the margins
everywhere forever.
Just like the jews, perhaps?
How the jews eventually gained the
footholds across the whole planet, from Britain to south east Asia,
and elsewhere, suggests an amazing – not necessarily respectable –
level of organization.
But it is known they have been
“travellers” and Nomads for millennia, many living on a basic
system of not settling, or of not owning local property. For
whatever reason, there was a preference for respecting the local
laws, and land laws in particular.
But how much of this very long
“tradition” of living among many nations, yet never trying to
claim ownership of land, has in fact been to further their “chosen
tribe” ideology, of one day, taking control of the whole planet?
Cunning people, the jews. Everyone
knows they're leaders in commerce, and thus are sharp as tacks in
knowing how to get the best deals.
So why not in politics, and that final,
ultimate claim?
Along with their making it their quiet
business to learn how all nations, monarchies and economies
functioned, they made it their business to learn best, how to subvert
those arenas, local, regional, national institutions and traditional
ways of management, so that, one day, perhaps many generations ahead,
they could undermine and take over, the government, the economies,
thus the people, of every nation where they were quietly allowed to
trade, etc.
To whose advantage were they doing all
this?
Ha! More rhetorical questions!
“The chosen tribe”.
“Nations” have, to a skeptic,
almost always been one form of crime syndicate or another, on top.
Called “government”, “monarchy”,
“dictator”, or such, they or their ancestors, family leaders or
allied political predecessors all, have gained dominance by
brutality, by war, by violence and oppression of “minorities”,
and opposing ideologists and crime syndicates, etc.
But never before to having control of
the whole planet.
We can be sure, all largely successful
leaderships, have mused and weighed that global dominance thing.
How many have been but part of this
jewish plan, would be discernible from written records.
And most would also have known that it
would only ever be attainable by war. Vicious, genocidal war.
But few would have seen the evolution
of weaponry used along that route to global dominance as being so
deadly as what we now have.
Albeit that many may have assessed that
massive loss of life, of cultures, of the environment too, would be
likely, if not necessary.
But how many could have calculated that
such a “desire', such a long march, to such a complete goal, would
draw an whole planet so close to it's own total annihilation?
Why should it have to have gone to that
extent?
Surely, Wise Masters of passed empires
would've expected that Wisdom, or even common sense, would've kept
people and leaders balanced enough to know that they must cease and
desist, no matter if a battle or war was won or lost?
For the sake of “life” itself?
Surely...?
Almost every non-western pre-modern,
pre-colonial culture and clash of cultures, have at times come to a
point in their feuds where they saw “enough is enough” and
stopped a slaughter.
Sure, as many if not more have
exterminated enemies, for a fanaticism unexplained, or for good
reason.
Plenty across time, have seen leaders
and whole bureaucracies and governments become “possessed” by
some devil of fanaticism or seriously unreasonable dark beliefs, such
that the wiser within or from across a border, knew the only option
was total extermination.
That happens! “Demonic possession”
is hard to expunge, once power takes over.
In “Jews” no less.
However, as said, most all
“governments” are, in one shape or another, but the dominant
crime cartel of any one time.
So, fighting them for whatever reason,
endangers their contenders becoming as possessed, ending with all
“sides” but fallen to darkness of mind, absence of reason, and
madness ruling, winners or not.
Not, a healthy situation to find an
whole planet in.
“Amoeba to Empire to
Self-Extermination”.
Extinction by madness.
Get off the grass..., Jacob Rothschild,
and family!
Hand all your precious “Reserve
Banks” over to Governments.
Return ALL schooling education
curricula to the Public domain of agenda and control, so that, all
“Reserve banks”, including the USA Federal Treasury, and “the
Bank of England” have boards of Democratically-elected public
politicians. Politicians elected by an intelligent electorate.
Money AND RELIGION out of politics!
Humanity cannot endure any further
wars, any further divisions of our species, for any one crime
syndicate's selfish power trip and gain.
“Nations”, must be restructured,
away from special interest groups, such as dynastic cartels and
super-families, corporations and subspecies overlording the majority,
and turned into INFORMED-Democracies, in which ALL The (voting)
People KNOW which Laws, TRUE LAWS, are fundamental to healthy
cultures, healthy economies, healthy customs and healthy personal
psychology.
But, while we need it, to healthy
equitable leadership primarily.
