In the "British" National Interest?

An unofficial post-British-election 2010 blog-post
from the rolling roof-rack of
Omaxa bin Not-On-Your-LIFE-Luvee!
Outlaw, for
GLOBAL LAND, Tax, Cult, Drug & Work
LAW REFORM!


Well, hello?

We're being drowned by news of a hung parliament in Britain.

Jolly ho!

Rather than fill my first few paragraphs with a brief of events over there post-2010 British elections, I'll see how I go without a warm-up?

A repeated phrase, from all of the 3 party leaders, is “in the national interest”.

Hmmm..?

Which “nation”?

England, Scotland, Wales or the colony of Northern Ireland?

OH! All of 'em!

Hmmmm.....?

As “Britain” is one of the most powerful “nations” on Earth today, only by way of being the most ruthless, vicious, blood-thirsty, etc, etc, (HELLO! MI6!) and by way of plundering and colonizing the largest number of other “nations” over the last 500 years, or so, and as “Britain” “assumed” the dominant, leadership chair in their slowly dying “Commonwealth”, and for that, have directed and forced those colonies to be how they/we now are - mostly failed states - there's a few things to consider today, after the 2010 “British” election.

One is exactly where this notion of “nation” ends?

Where ARE Britain's borders exactly?

This might lead to the question of where, therefore, does “the national interest” end?

Clearly, “Britain”, as we define it today, is the bighouse mob they are, because they still have enormous influence and control in many other “nations” of the big ball, having stolen extraordinary amounts of booty over the colonial period.

As this election is centred at the English/British parliament, called “Westminster”, the place where many parliamentary systems now underpinning many of those “Commonwealth nations” have their origin, is it a given that any reforms to the “British” system will flow on to the other nations?

Another pop-up question before I jump on the 'net and go serfing, is, what percentage of Brits bothered to go to the polling booths and cast a vote??

As it's all a casual affair, over there, and as at times there have been notably low turnouts, I re-put an old line of mine, which may not be necessary to put again because I've heard a few British polies this time say that “the system is broken”, a line which states that in a voluntary voting system, any percentage of over about ten percent (10%) who do not vote, must be counted as a vote of no confidence in the “system”. So when there are over 30% of eligible voters not voting, then the system is DEFINITELY broken. So those non-voters are in fact voting. Etcetera.

Another point on voluntary voting, a system I do not necessarily disagree with, sometimes the weather is bad enough to effect significant numbers of voters. If by chance it's a cold and stormy day on polling day, the drop in votes can be huge, so the results can not be seriously taken seriously, and, by rights, a new election should be held.

That's the REALPolitik view, but as “politics” are today, whether in Britain, the USA, or other voluntary voting nations, the logistics and expenses make that prohibitive.

So.., election Britannia 2010?

Reforms ARE an imperative there, and the Lib/Democrats I'd say, clearly won as many seats as they have because they campaigned on “electoral reform”, amongst others.

So..., complexer it is, and gets...

LDP leader Nick Clegg (Well Done, Outsider!) and his team must now decide which of the big two they will co-alish with to extend the betrayal of Brits.

Funny that the old “change of the guard” rules have played out, so that the “opposition” have won the most seats.

Time to strike up the band, maytes... “Swing to the left, swing to the right, swing all day, swing all night, doh-say-doh and-a-round we go..., earlay in the morning....etc”.

(“Drop your balls upon the floor, swing them round, til they're sore!”

Ironic that the incumbents remain, due to the rules in Westminster, even with a minority.

If Nick Clegg wants to not be strung-up by his own party faithfuls, he surely cannot choose to form a coalition with the conservatives, who aren't interested in a more equitable system?

Labour has been reformist over the last 13 years, by devolving Scotland to having it's own houses again, and Wales (I guess?), as well, I vaguely recall other structural changes which seem to have been “reforms”.

So on that issue alone, it would seem Cleggy has only one choice, and defect to Cuba!

HOWEVER......?

Simplifying things “over there” somewhat, “Who-o-o.., is Mista Brown??” (unquote Bob Marley), and what place has he held in that tyrannical mechanism called the “IMF”?

I seem to think he was the treasurer for about a decade, that is, Chancellor of the Exchequer under Tony Blair?

Which sort of brings me back to the qvestion of “exactly where do the nation of 'Britain's' borders end?”

Britain would not have the top-end lifestyles it now enjoys were it not for it's claiming ownership of “Australia” for one, and the many other previously sovereign nations.

So, this leads to; Surely it is a must, today, for 'Britain' to consider “in the national interest” to mean “...in the planet's interest”?

I recall a statement from one Tony Blair about a decade ago, which said that “Britain could no longer consider ethics in it's foreign policies” or something similar.

“...Could no longer....?!?!?!”

Of course, by “Britain” he meant the likes of British Petroleum, and, Lloyd's Bank, and other resource capitalists and financiers of Bigplunder Inc.

In light of GFC part two (pending), and in ascertaining it's root cause - bigplunder and hold the ethics - any SERIOUS new government in Britain would seek primarily to put “Ethics” back on the mantelpiece, methinks.

It is interesting that “The Greens” were not in the race over there. Is this a silent recognition within Britain that they are on top of the developed nations' tree, because they have been so mutilating of the planet's environment for centuries, and for what this untenable and unethical attitude has brought the Brits, in having the highest average of material wealth, it is now obviously impossible for them to “Go Green!” like many other “”nations” are, because it would be an admission of guilt, or such?

Congrats to the Brighton Green M.. Lucas! By the way.

Looks like y' gonna be a bit lonely, luv?

As Nick Clegg is allavasudden the “king-maker”, and as he says the LDP are Reformists, he's in a spot where he can be pretty tough.

He has every right to DEMAND “humility” from both ''red and blue” parties, as there does seem to be consensus that “it's broke!, and as both have been carrying the can forever, it's really THEIR FAULT!

So much, therefore, that Cleggy (almost) has the right or indeed the duty, to assume the Chair hisself!

If they're really talking REALPolitik Reform, then without stalling the processes of governing the er.., “nation” tooo much, NiClegg would shake the stale bread from the box by insisting on a tripartite government, and do away with two and more “sides” altogether!

If Aunty ''Lizzie's cuz (Davie Cameron) can't admit that “Westminster” is out of date, and that the “right” were so-called because they sat on the side closest to the door to the privy (joke!) (in the 1500s), and that it was the side preferred by the LANDOWNERS of the era, then TO THE STOCKS WIFF 'IM!!!

Today, all things considered, as “Britain” is so high-up the ladder of power and influence etc, and as the world teeters on the edge of “GFC part two - The Sequel”, it is time they got off their padded fannies and began doing the Maths in there that 'ouse of parlayment!

One reality is - that were Britains' “Houses” to get SERIOUS about their own economy, then they would have to get SERIOUS about the world's economy as well.

What effect, for example, would Australia becoming a Republic have on Britain's economy and politics?

Can the world, and thus Britain, continue on the unsustainable path of over-consumption, without some serious impact upon the lives of the British?

Of course not!

And what about the plights of Greece, Spain, Portugal, et al, and thus the Euro-zone, and the impact upon Britain?

I reckon, from my retirement ute, that Britain, or it's political elite, is better-off biting the bullet now, by ignoring the tremors and curses from the stock-markets and the banks, and start talking seriously about FUNDAMENTAL Reforms to their economy, not just their voting system

Surely the howls and weeping from the share-holders and future's markets hotshots are easier to bear, and deal with, than the streets of Britain erupting with the violence we see in Athens today?

If one more Eurapean “nation” goes-off like Greece is now, it's gonna get REALStikkee elsewhere, and that will be next-to-impossible for any government to handle, short of sending in the troops to shoot their own citizens, en-masse.

Besides... it's just not British, say what, ol' chum?

Prevention is always better than the cure.

Britain's tentative predicament now, as with that of the rest of the “Euro-zone”, is solely due to the rampant arrogance of their collective abuse of force over the rest of the world under the auspice of the IMF, dating back centuries.

So “Reforms” must institute fundamental changes to the way the “euro-zone” aka the IMF, plunders the rest of the world, from the USA to Zimbabwe, from East Timor to the West Indies.

This means that the world's biggest plunderers who rose to dominance under the protective wings and armies of the IMF, previously the British East India Company, bigplunder such as today's Rio Tinto (etc), and their global banks (HSBC and the Swiss counterparts) and their networks and sub-branches, must be told to acquiesce to regionally local government systems of taxation, etc.

However, as that “nation” of “Britain” so influences the world today, they will not be treated as being sincere, they will not be taken seriously, unless they lead the world in unifying the world's systems of taxation, where resources and mining etc are concerned, so that the bigplunder corps cannot simply up-stumps and move to a poorer or other region to avoid paying what is justly due.

This game of the bigplunder nations, of which “Britain” is number one, of forcing the rules upon others purely so that those rules best suit the bigplunderer, and “”the devil may care” about the plundered nation, has to stop.

Again, it has been this ruthless and supremely arrogant attitude from the very likes of Britain, which has brought the current and looming economic AND environmental disasters upon the world.

So.., “prevention is better than cure” would be a wise adage for NiClegg to adopt in the coming days, weeks, months and years. Indeed centuries!

I hope he, at least, sees that Green Economics is but THE Vital basis upon which to act, in the coming....

Indeed, as most all of the planet's Original Peoples - The Aborigines - would agree with, no economics, and no laws have precedent over the Highest ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.

The Highest Economic laws, in fact, have their Foundation in these.

“BP” the corporation now slurping their profits away in the Gulf of Mexico, the corporation now and forever to be known not as “British Petroleum”, nor HOHO! “Better Petrol”, but as “Biggest Polluter”, yet another bigplunder corporation of the IMF, must be brought to fully recognise that Environmental Laws precede ALL economic laws and laws fabricated to ensure profits of the most powerful few.

As US President Barack Obama has said “the big game is over”.

Therefore, if any of the big three British political parties are serious about GOOD Government, Reforms cannot begin, without ALL OF THEM, adapting the “in the national interest” slogan, to read “in the GLOBAL interest”, and that cannot proceed, without their collective agreement to effect MAJOR Reforms to their parent company, the IMF, and to setting up IMMEDIATELY, a Global Charter for the Standardisation of Taxation.

Or such.....

All these, are within your Rights, Duties AND Reach, to Perform, Nick Clegg!

If, that is, you ARE focused upon putting the “national-cum-GLOBAL interest” before party interests?

Jolly ho!

A pesty plug-and-post, from
Omaxa bin News-Chop.OM
riding the magic testies of
OpenSource-Oh-Shit-I've-Retired.OM

Jesus, I WILL retire!

06/05/10.

Yesterday I spent time doing something useful on my ute, a much needed door! I ignored the news, most of it trivial, but kept one eye on Greece, it's pending revolution (GO THE UNIONISTS!), and the eventual effects of Eurape's (or the IMF's) disgusting over-consumption and resources drain on the rest of the world, as is loomingly expressed by the collapse of Spain's, Portugal's, probably Italy's and as today's news item on the British poll happening tomorrow (their time), Britain's inescapable public debt.

Today's New York Times online
(http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/06/world/europe/06britain.html) headlines an article

“As Britain Goes to Polls, Economic Clouds Hover”

which has dire warnings of “...a ticking time bomb” as quoted from one Ruth Lea, who, as her “creds” tell, seems to know what she speaks about.

Another line in the item is “...some analysts have suggested that this might be a good election to lose.”

Hohohoho, and a hohoho!

Whatever happens there, I reckon we're all in for a “GFC part two - The Sequel”.

As I advocate, a PROPER economy, wherever we look, would solve most all of these apparent crises, and avert an otherwise unavoidable war, perhaps a BIG war.

But for some strange, perhaps “alien” reason, those on top of the pile don't like a Just economy.

This week's Australian federal government's cowardice regarding implementing Ken Henry's national land tax, is one local example.

I'm inclined to the belief that ALP's popularity in the “Newspoll” survey dived because Rudd and co were “advised” (SNAP! I hope they are not still using the ADVERTISING AGENCY of the BRITISH Saachi and Saachi to run their policy agendas? Saachis were the ones who told the ALP to pull the plug, and take a dive in 2004!) to not go with the land tax recommendation.

Saachis, like KPMG Peat Marwick or whatever they, KPMG, branded themselves as in the 1980s, are very pro-IMF, as we saw of KPMG in the 1980s when they falsified a John Cain ALP Victorian government's audit, which sent Cain and co to the sinbin in the next election, and another false recession ignited by the conspired "fall" of Pyramid Building Society.

So getting any honorable policy shift from today's ALP while it is answering to foreign interests, not unlike Rio Tinto and a not-really-Australian BHP(-Billiton) of the last few days, is the old “....blood out of a stone” scenario.

As written and supported by plenty of references in the revealing document/book “Drugs Inc., British Bankers and Soviet Commissars”, the IMF, previously the British East India Company (BEIC), actually bought the English parliament “...lock, stock and barrel...” in 1783, after a bankrupted England lost the United States in the 1776 American war of independence.

Nothing much has changed in that arena since then, and as Australia was first fleeted in 1788 by England, ie., the BEIC, we are still very much owned by the rebranded BEIC - the IMF.

This explains the high prices we pay for most imported stuff, and is why nothing Honorable ever gets done in the governance of the nation. It is also why Aborigines are still marginalised and STILL HAVE NOT BEEN GIVEN (BACK) THEIR SOVERIEGNTY!

This same unashamedly evil IMF, who made their endless wealth and still do, by growing, shipping (P&O “cruises”) promoting and selling opium aka heroin around the world (Afghanistan?!??), demand from any-and-all of our so-called governments (federal, state and, AND Local Councils) that private speculation on, and the outright criminal theft of ever-higher dollar prices for land, stay exactly as they, or the policies, are.

Australia exists on the Brit-Eurapean elites' books singularly as a place for their upclubbers all to retire/run/escape, when the whole economic and environmental structure collapses in the northern hemisphere.

And, by the news from Greece (GO THE UNIONISTS!), Spain, AND Britain, et al, that collapse is not really very far into the future!

So...., downheredownunder..., the blimbo Rudd and girls sit on their spoiled fat-cells refusing to be the first kids on the planetary block to call some Just Order to life in the fat-lane by making CORRECT our taxation-read-theft and land policies.

It struck me that, though I intuit that Rudd and the clubsters WOULD go the full mountain of True Taxation Reforms, they can't because Rome wants a Kkristian revolution, led by their long-bred puppet.

This, of course, so the most evil cult on Earth can (falsely) boast that they were right about Jesus coming back.

FAAAARRRKKK-KKOFF!!!

Another intuited scenario, mine or not, is that Rudd and the Clubsters recognise how cemented the current regimes of evil are, in their rotting ways, and that not even a Progressive ALP, nor any other overseas mainstream “left-wing” tribe (not USA's Democrats, nor Russia's Putin/Medvedev government) can take that “Great Leap Forward” into Economic and Educational Justice and Rectitude, by beginning the evermore necessary global land reform corrections.

So, as we witness apparent “softcockness” in Canberra, they (in Canberra) are planning for a surprise land-slide victory and overrunning by - The Greens!

I really hope so. Not that I place much “faith” in “hope” these days, seeing as Rome, Zurich and London, et al, appear demented-in-cement.

So..., as no-one in Britain really wants to win tomorrow's election, and as Athens falls off the tourorrist destination list, although it may attract a swarm of overseas and over-borders REVOLUTIONARIES who want to help the Greek Philosopher-Unionists ensure that the rest of Eurape and the evil IMF are forced to go the full mountain of land reforms etc etc etc., we'll all have to wait and see whether the rest of CATHOLIC stuck-in-the-mud western Eurape (Spain, Portugal, Ferengi, and Romano, et al) chooses Nobility, Honor, Rectitude, and Intellect, over “faith” and Kkristian kkorruption?

Damn the bleach-brained blimbos!

Everyone on Earth wants their gold back!

AND THEIR LAND!!!

Arrest the Pope!

And hope for at least a hung parliament in Britain, with Cleggy picking his portfolios in and from a minority Labour management team.

Whatever, they HAVE to bring the IMF to account, for EVERYTHING, from the price of tea, from the price of LAND, from the price of GOVERNMENT, to international, GLOBAL drug laws.


See ya'!

Omaxa bin Re-Eartha
in retirement