Is "Leadership" a necessity or even a product of warring times

This e-ssay is a diary note with the issue of leadership in war and in Democracy in Peace, etc.


Heirarchy - to the point of Leadership might be the most pragmatic way to run an army (and usually the People are in part, of that army) in times of war.

Thus we have leaders who take us to war.

Leadership per se, may be a result or product of warring times.

As Humanity generally professes to wanting World Peace, we remain, in warring times, in hunger for the "Leader" to bring the Peace.

We are not looking at what role leadership takes. It may be good for sports and armies, but is it applicable to "Civilian Communities"?

Or, is 'leadership' necessary in Civil Government?

If there were a Law, a Rock-Solid Law, known as the Key to Earthly Harmony, Scientific, Straight Forward, Tangible, Wholistic, that existed, the most secure place to make Perennially Safe that Wise Law must surely be in the Hearts of the People - everyone. "You are That, Nachiketas!"

This, being upon which we Govern ourselves, through all levels of Work, upto Government Ministeries, is Democracy.

Honest Government would have a Duty to make such Wisdom available and even Taught to the People.


Everyone's welcome to take this up and expand upon it.

Plagiarise as you dare, but think and mull about it.


AUM

Max No Difference