Newspoll under Fire!

110628Tu

Here's an email I just sent to the federal minister for Communications, Senator Steven Conroy, and to the office of Greens federal leader, Senator Bob Brown......., after sending the bold piece to the ABC Investigative Unit....

"Here's an email I just lodged with the ABC Online Investigative Unit, at around 10.00AM this morning.....

Hi, just now I went to the Newspoll website, looking for the questions they asked in what the ABC News Breakfast talking heads on ABC1 told the viewers this morning was 'the latest Newspoll', but found no reference to 'the latest opinion poll' on the Newspoll website, this one relating to our federal political leaders' and parties' popularity.

It seems undemocratic that this should be allowed to be the case, where we are forced to rely solely upon the news media, in this case our ABC, and have no immediate access to the opinion poll itself.

Also, it is not correct that the inquiring public cannot view the breadth of the 'demographic' of those polled, so-as to ascertain from which sectors of society the answers and opinions are sought.

Although it's arguable that the service provider, 'Newspoll' has the right to arrange their website as they prefer, it is, it might appear, deliberately hard to get to any poll results.

'Opinion polls' are dangerous things, and can be used to pernicious ends in the wrong hands.

As they are grabbed so eagerly by the media and used undemocratically to sway public opinion, there has to be much more regulation, detail and open-ness of their questions, their demographic and their results available to anyone who inquires.

The loose 'opinions', given that an "opinion" is merely an "unsubstantiated theory", of a very small number of 'anonymous' people can never be justified as something upon which governments are put in jeopardy.

I shall be referring this issue, Newspoll and the inappropriate use, or misuse of opinion polls as released via the media, to investigative authorities as soon as possible.

However, as this website of ABC's Online Investigative Unit office says it investigates abuses of media etc, a la "....encourages whistleblowers, and others with access to information they believe should be revealed for the public good, to contact us...", I put it first to you, to do something toward identifying and correcting this anomaly in our deeply awry democratic process, and the freedom of deeply biased 'offshore' media houses , aka Murdoch's News International, The Australian and Newspoll, to manipulate the freedoms they have to unAustralian advantage.

That the ABC, via this morning's News Breakfast program, uses such vague and clearly biased information to put anti-government negative thinking in the minds of Australians is reprehensible, and indeed, in any legitimate court, would be regarded and judged as 'criminal'!

'Please consider!'

I believe it is in the interests of Good Government in Australia, for our federal government to firstly, establish a department dealing specifically with 'media' , and secondly, to investigate fully this clearly politically destructive situation of such unspecific and deliberately subversive 'opinion polls' being made into news by the ABC, et al.

Yours,

Max Earth
aka Max N Cook
aka Omaxa bin Eartha

Outlaw, for
GLOBAL
Land,
Tax,
Housing,
Cult,
Drug,
Work
Education
& Environmental
LAW REFORM

Opinion Pollster poll - UPDATE

05/07/10.

After one week since sending an email requesting answers to my selection of questions from our opinion pollsters, and receiving TWO responses from one pollster, Gallup, it was clear that they'd say anything and were generally not interested.

So, thus far, I haven't gone further on this little survey.

“....the list of questions I have put together may well be outside any parameters of those a large organisation would be prepared to answer.”

May well be......

So, thanks to the two respondents from the Gallup polling company, one Eric Nielsen (STRAnge?) and Julie, who telephoned me.

A renegade reporter like meself, ain't never gonna get far with these multinational types, what wiff no cult chur!

Stepping back from the main game of our federal election follies, to just watching, NOT via “Sky news”, refusing to accept any baton, waiting for the polity, the general publics' conscience (“Con” + “Science”!!) to speak, whenever the election is called, not relying on any of our politicians or parties to save the world, I'll be interested to see just how successful the last attempt by the global cabal inc., was, at destroying The Greens ascent?

What is probably of greater significance, and import, was that after Gillard assumed the PM's chair, voter preference for the Opposition, according to the devil of our opinion pollsters, stayed about the same, at an all time low.

Greens, in one poll, fell by about half, and Labor regained about the same, which says something.

But, damn this addiction to polls (ah! Murdoch's got us dancing on the end of his needle!), a poll from today tells us the Greens are zooming back UP the charts!

With a week or so to absorb the events in Canberra, and via the news links from Canberra to London and back to our little screens, I'm inclined to sum-up the turmoil by saying that most everyone watching Canberra and Rudd's demise, knew that the global arseholes in the Murdoch media camp, and campaigns were behind that moment.

This says heaps about how corrupt and out-of-our-hands this media-politic charade we know as political elections are. Whether they've ALWAYS been this bad, I can't say, but, with age, one draws closer to that being the right assumption.

Somewhere years ago, I learned a trick about how to expose tyranny.

The first thing you need is a decoy. A puppet who has very thick skin, and who is “tame” enough to not be swayed into throwing themselves in jail, by reacting to the culprits calculated taunts luring the decoy into committing a crime.

Then you release him/her to be played with by the cabal. It can take decades, and even centuries to bring-out all the psycho-pathologies and flaws and outright deranged thinking and behaviour by the tyrants, but eventually, they will be exposed.

Something of this nature was played-out last week. But rather than the highly-strung property-speculating Catholic church being stripped naked, the global cabal's media network was unclothed, to some degree.

From where I comment, James Murdoch and his pathological network of wannabe megalomaniacs in the “Sky News” channel, were seen to be right behind the ALP leadership upset, and were manipulating the opinion-polls, newspapers, internet online news and the television news services to their gleeful and psychotic delight.

It was no coincidence that in one media Q&A, the new Prime Minister Julia Gillard gracefully-yet-ruthlessly took the Sky news anchor “David Spears” by the nose and lowered it - him - into a bucket of shit, by saying, after he'd asked a question about calling the election, (Gillard, pointing back to the other side of the “media scrum”) “.... yes, we'll get back to the boys in a minute...”

Subtle, and some might say it was nothing.

So..., our PM is prepared to air her disgust at what put her into the PM's chair, or better, at WHO put her up there - Sky news - and the Murdoch cabal, with subtle mockery, but clearly, at this pre-election point, is restricted from taking it further.

One wondered, upon suggestion, that Rudd's ousting had similarities to the infamous “Dismissal” of Gough Whitlam and his ALP government in the late 1970s. I was stoned as a coot in London at that time, knew nothing at all about politics, and so it meant nothing to me when I heard. Thus I can't say.

Were we not sitting on an election, much more may have been said by our politicians and by some of our media, even though it does seem that all Integrity and fearlessness has GAWN from those bunkers these years?

I have the feeling that Murdoch and cabal, including the mining corps, banks et al, have in place a standing threat hanging over the heads of all of Australia's parliamentary and media and political and civil service members, which basically says that any attempt to move Australia away from being a colony in-essence, of Britain and Eurape, will incite all-and-every manner of subversion, skulduggery, defamation, insinuation, allegation and charges against the proponents of such reforms.

I have the feeling that this was exactly what the Murdoch cabal did when they manipulated opinion polls and the reactionary media through the weeks leading up to the disruptions in the ALP, and to the intended goal of removing Kevin Rudd.

In collusion, of course, with the Liberal/National Opposition parties.

While most watchers have known forever that the media, the “fourth estate”, has power enough to ignite world wars, and to set anyone against their own government, the recent events, where our (private, cult-backed, capitalist, offshore voicebox for the global land-and-resources-grabbing cabal of white-fella) media so manipulated everyone, that the ALP had no choice but to enact a “circuit-breaker” by pushing Gillard to do as she did, served well to expose the tyranny we have suffered and endured for 150 years at least from foreign power-brokers.

Investigations may never find any Murdoch fingerprints, but more than ever will know that they - Rupert and James Murdoch - were going beyond the call of duty, and beyond any jurisprudence which may apply to them or to the media, and beyond all ethical and legal boundaries by so brazenly causing undue chaos and turmoil within our political processes.

It has been clear to myself for quite a while, though not for as long as most all witches, that the powers-that-be, including the cabal of and behind the global media consortia of the Murdoch dynasty, have deemed it their right to deploy the occult powers to “win” their little game of “...who can be the most paranoid for excessive power”.

Thus, as was played out in June 2010, the psychic fingerprints of one James Murdoch were all over the faces of his sycophantic reporters - David Spears, Ashley Gillen and their other political anchor - and the totally unethical affair of causing mayhem in our federal parliament.

This and other related media sensations, are undoubtedly connected to the wider paranoia that exists inside the global cabal who depend on Australia giving-up her resources - and real estate, for next to nothing.

The “mining tax” and other reforms, even the long-quietened “National Land Tax” recommended by the Henry Tax Review, were really frightening the upclubsters of the world, from Israel to Hong Kong, from Melbourne to Moscow, and so their little “mental bovver boyz”, juniors with no sense of caution nor genuine political wisdom, the “journalists and reporters and scare-mongers” inside the megalithic Murdoch media conglomerate, were unleashed from their little desks.

And what fun they had! Share markets were jittery! States were shaky! Media was in a frenzy! And the ALP was catatonic!

And their inhouse puppet, Tony Abbott, just followed his offshore instructions and said “Ah? The Prime Minister has got to go!”

I expect he now regards that as one of his “triumphs”?

“The coalition experienced no lift in it's popularity according to the latest opinion poll.”

While the Greens, are back!

All in all, a classic case of “...power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts - absolutely...”

And..., boiling all the psychic and psychological game-playing by these self-deluded “masters of the world”, James Murdoch and the like, it becomes permanently exposed that his kind of speed-brain uptop of the pile, who lord it in the fanciest penthouses and learjet lifestyles from Canary Wharf et al, are in fact the most mentally ill.

Psycho-pathologically permanently, even genetically insane.

From other investigations of similar ridiculously wealthy and powerful families and dynasties, the same symptoms resulting from inbreeding and mutated gene-codes appear and seem to take over their minds.

Megalomania.

Mega low, mania.

Kind of sums up free market (Zionist) capitalism, doesn't it?

What I might hope reads from this e-ssay, is that the Australian voter, this election year, has been exposed to the dark side of our political farce, through the eagerness and idiocy of the offshore powers, in the Murdoch cabal, before it was too late to cast their vote.

Most subversion to such as our political processes, have been kept as deep secrets from the voters, and usually for some ludicrous 30 years, before they can be told.

This event in late June 2010, where our Prime Minister was illegally and subversively removed from his appointed/elected position, by foreign, unfriendly political forces, exposes their game-plan, whether the ALP or the Lib/Nats are in.

It also, perhaps for the first real time, with the Greens rising as a genuine, “up-to-speed” political contender, has told the voters that we have an option to the brutal and terribly-destructive old-kings models of government, as we've endured since federation. (Since 1808!)

Certainly, Australia is but a very little player on this globe, thus far, and the forces of wealth are well-advanced in the game of power.

But it cannot be denied, that the forces of Simple and Pure Justice, which preside in the hearts of by far the majority of non-white Humans, have shown the larger percentage of the planet's population just how sick those who are born into wealth-endless-wealth are, and that their delusions of winning the “race race”, to the point where the totally deluded Cecil Rhodes asserted the planet belonged to the white skins, at the terminal expense of non-whites, are but as dust, blown away with the morning breeze of the New Day.

Maybe my channels for superlatives is open, and I'm flying-in unrealistic dreams?

But maybe the 2010 Australian federal election will take the wizz out of the heads of the likes of James Murdoch and his “Lex Luther” imaginary megalomaniacal shadow?

Maybe SOMEONE will manage to put in process the inquiry into the “Rudd deposition”, and the offshore medias' hand in it, and maybe..., Australia will find a majority of other nations willing to support us in breaking away from our cruel and thieving landlords, to the point where we waste no more hot air and time in becoming a Republic?

But succeeding over the megabucks poured into the right wing advertising consortia, who are so adamantly against giving yer average Aussie affordable housing and everyone on Earth an easier time, actually simply takes your vote!

We have to expect some sensation or another before election day, engineered by media or the churches, because, as I said, the uptop clubsters of Easy Street, clubsters who all had their minds and hearts and souls adulterated by one of the devilish churchs, are freaking-out that their lazy, selfish speculative and wholly unethical lifestyles will be tapered-down should the Greens and their more Honorable approach to life, win enough seats.

They care not at all about the overall benefits positive land and tax reforms DO bring society. So why care about them?

Once the Greens are given the clear and ongoing signal from the voters, then they will be confident to move forward, even just setting the scene for the larger more effective economic reforms.

Reforms, it must be said, that an Honorable Kevin Rudd, as elected Prime Minister, went to the chopping-block advocating.

Senator Bob Brown is far from being a megalomaniac (and I don't think Rudd was either), and seems always to prefer consensus. I think he, like the Wise, will move only so far as the Demos, the People, will allow him or ask him. So it is important that Australians do not forget about the changes we want after the election, and don't fall back into leaving it all to the polies.

Positive, legal, economic reforms will need daily approval from the punters, which may mean well-organised demonstrations and “sit-ins” et al, around and at key locations. With ongoing “out-there” on the street support, subversive media is strained from throwing it's barrages of propaganda onto the TV screens, and through opinion polls.

While it's impossible, but nevertheless recommended, all of us should refuse to answer opinion poll questions. Whether they're from government or private companies, or even from “think-tanks” and Universities, we cannot be certain of their independence, nor their desired results.

In fact, there should be a moratorium on opinion pollsters asking questions and publishing them prior to elections. I say this knowing it goes against my own intuition, and probably against Democracy.

Of course, they can start a war in a bathtub if they really choose to, and so street presence, through demonstrations and marches, are just as vulnerable to the stirrers.

But, with numbers, who are standing beside each other, and who are not fragmented off into their own little castles, to switch-off or be side-tracked by - global media inc - where they have no one to discuss these news items with, on the street, they/we are stronger than a rich psychopath with his hi-tech joystick in his hands.

However, the best way to fuck a movement, is to introduce too many key issues.

Most know my preferences, but perhaps they are not so vital?

Choose the key policies, and reforms - Legal and Economic - and learn all there is to know about them, and about their opposites. Then, stick with them.

If they are correct, they will not conflict with policies from another arena, but instead, will fall together like lovers.

“Loose lips, sink ships” is an old defence line in war, so ensure spokesfolk know their stuff, and don't confuse or complicate statements.

In shaking-up the old order, as we many might like to do this year, it's known that some rather narrow line has to be adopted across the party, as it were.

Dogma? Surely Greens are “post-dogma” and are as well all highly Intelligent, so need fear no gaffs, or wrong statements.

The still-rising Peter Garrett knows how easy it can be to blow it? And he's a Green!?

But he was lured into a very dogma-tight party.

Another failing waiting to happen, is when a group thinks they cannot lose, or that they are so-so-so-so right, that they can't blow it, no matter what they say.

Frankly, as most of us here in Australia, are unfettered egomaniacs, and as the smallest few not only DO twice-daily “Silent Mind” Meditation, but take the calm with them into the warzone, and, AND actually achieve higher inner heights through Meditation and allied ritual practices, all groups are mainly membered by loose-lips, who mostly cannot be trusted to impart the accurate and wholly positive line from their group.

That's why we learn to tell lies, and why groups and parties have “dogma”, for members to learn, so they can recite it or drop back into it in outside conversations.

So, for the Greens to keep rising, so increases the need to be wary of friendly questions, because in this cult-ravaged age, spies are everywhere, and with the psychotic determination of such as the Christian Brothers, et al, to keep their own large cult in credit and in the real estate market, they will send hoards of friendly little private school morons into the festival, to either catch some stoner out, or to start a riot.

Just ahead of their school mates who work in hohohooo.... media!

For some reason...., I just feel sure that no media hype can stop the Greens now, and thus, the Australian Republic, dissolving the states, and land and tax reform of the most delightful kind?

And...., perhaps we CAN save the wee-pottermouse, and a few whales as well?

And a rahrahrah, to wee-Jimmy!

Countryman bin Eartha
Outlaw, for
GLOBAL Land, Tax, Cult, Housing, Drug & Work
LAW REFORM.

Emails to Opinion Pollsters - not sent

Here's an email I sent out the other day to five or so opinion polling companies

Hi!

I write commentaries on political affairs, and am interested in the effect opinion polls such as your company's have on public voting intentions and outcomes.
There are a series of questions I'd like to ask someone in your company, as we near the 2010 federal election, on "demographics" generally.
If I throw questions at you, polite but straight questions, will someone reply promptly to them with the details, via email, to myself?
I email these preliminaries to you, to save time.
If you aren't prepared to give informative answers, I'll not waste my time beyond these few minutes.
Please respond with minimum delay, because the federal election is my focus for now.
Extended delays will only count as against your being impartial pollsters.

Yours,
Max Earth
aka Max N Cook
Outlaw, for
Global Land, Tax, Cult, Drug, & Work
Law Reform.


Here is the as yet, only response:

From: Nielsen, Eric (of GALLUP polls as it 'appens?)
Received: Tuesday, 29 June, 2010, 3:01 AM

Hello Max,

Thank you for your inquiry. I don’t think the preliminary questions you might have attached made it through our contact form. Please feel free to resend them to me and I will review and advise you on whether we can respond.

Cheers,
Eric
ERIC NIELSEN
Senior Director, Media Strategies


Ripper!

Here's what I composed today, intending to send it back to "Eric".

Thanks Eric, for responding.

The few questions put in the first email, were the "preliminaries", so nothing was "lost" on the way.

I guess, not being a professional in media (I'm a public school autodidact) nor having had the requisite education to know the "PC" route one should take in such communications, the list of questions I have put together may well be outside any parameters of those a large organisation would be prepared to answer.

As you may be aware, Australia was the "victim" of a "coup de ta" of sorts last week, where our elected Prime Minister was ousted, just a short time before we are due to go to a federal election.

His elected party, the Labor party, or a couple of "right-wing factions" are reported to have managed the removal of Kevin Rudd, but I, being rather inordinately influential in our political affairs, have my suspicions?

In the weeks and months prior to this questionable event, our opinion polls and media were playing havoc with the campaigns and with therefore the preferences of voters, such, I have strong "feelings" that, the Prime Minister was not removed from his elected PM's chair by any ethical nor valid authority.

Rather, I have no doubt that the media and their "offshore" masters, namely one Rupert Murdoch and son, and their global cabal, were behind the act.

Opinion polls were integral in this, as they were being done after each event, and their "results" broadcast on our media. A narrow range of media, to say the least.

Therefore, as far as I'm concerned, "questions must be asked" of the veracity and integrity, and of the independence of influential things like.... "opinion polls".

Thus far, I reiterate that I am no expert in any arena, when it comes down to it, but am observant and skeptical of such events and what, or who are really behind them?

From memory, two pinion polls were at the forefront of this affair, Gallup not being one of them. But there are others at which I intend to "gun" so-to-say, because what actually happened last week was quite immoral, quite illegal and a heinous affront to the voters of Australia and to democracy itself, whether here or in any other country.

So..., it cannot be ignored, that media, and their sideline operations, such as opinion polls, have to be lawful, ethical and not allowed to manipulate voter intentions and the parliaments of any nation.

I would be interested in your, or your organisation's views on these points, and perhaps, answers to the few questions that I have.

I am reputed as an Outlaw REALPolitik Journalist (my own "subtitle"), mainly due to a bizarre life and circumstance, so, much of my commentary is "challenging" in the least.

Nevertheless, I recommend you go to my weblog site at
www.maxearth.blogspot.com and preview my thoughts on today's politics, here and abroad.

I have posted a few articles, one which has the questions to opinion pollsters in it, which go to these general matters, fundamentally important matters for everyone who sees the Merit and Worth of Democracy.

Finally, I note your last name is Nielsen. Are you related (1st question perhaps?) to the AC Nielsen research and pollster organisation?

If so, is there any connection between Gallup and Nielsen polling?

(I'm sorry, I operate solo, so often cannot do the research on this type of "next question".)

Being a skeptic, I must ask for some assurance that my non-invasive questions will be answered, once I email them to whomever is appointed.

I cannot emphasize enough the importance to Democracy here and globally surrounding this, these types of affairs and manipulations.

While I operate solo, I do have a strong contingent of fellow Advocates for a more Just world, and I know that this matter will not go unaddressed.

"Head will roll" as far as I'm concerned. Perhaps a naive statement to a global corporation such as you represent, however......... O yaye! Though I go into the valley.....

Don't worry, I'm definitely not a Christian!

Yours,

Max Earth
aka Max N Cook

Outlaw, for
Global Land, Tax, Cult, Drug, & Work Law Reform.

By 6.30pm tonight (now), I reckon it's not worth sending that email to Eric Nielsen. But I'll send an email suggesting he reads the related weblog posts.

It ain't over yet, Murdoch.

Opinion Pollsters, BIASED?! NO-O!

I sent the email mentioned in the previous weblog, to six (6) pollsters, those which provided online, email-type access.

Galaxy had no online access, or "contact" portal, only offering a telephone number.

And now, as I write, I'm waiting for "Crikey.com.au" to open their 'net portal, with no success, through any of Crikey's links.

I've had the same blockage to Crikey before, and seeing as their main man, whose name I forget (Steven someone...?), is a chum of THEIR ABC's Phillip Adams, a shrinking icon of my passed ignorance, who is as much a 30-pieces-of-silver part of my ongoing exile and suffering, and Steven Someone is obviously a "gentrified chappie" from the upper echelons of our uptop, upclub, upemselves them-first society-and-nation, it's not likely that he/Crikey will accept an email from little ol' King Omaxa.

So-hohoho.........

In this hi-teckery and internetery age, anyone, especially in media, who relies nearly totally on the internet etc for their own income, or to expedite whatever it is they do, must surely be put in the "VERY SUSPICIOUS" basket if they do not have an email address available, methinks.

Or..., if they are not receptive to online inquiries, in whichever way?

When I was being the unwitting victim of the Vatican, via the New South Wales government and police force, I was arrested and charged with fabricated felonies. When I began gathering evidence for my own defense, I was a little bit amazed that neither the police force, the NSW Legal Aid, nor the Local Court houses, had an email address available to the public.

But we can surely expect such deliberate attempts to interfere with the course of justice, in NSW, say WHAAAH?

Truly, while the "system" remains as it is, we are all doomed.

Back to opinion pollsters, I'm sure that, in the interests of a more just society, there must be far more exposure, access and regulation of these opinion pollster organisations, because, as we saw last week, it was principally they, who brought Kevin Rudd undone, with their biased and agenda-ridden polls. Polls backed no doubt, by the NSW parliamentary rum clubsters!

One from last week, made news headlines across the nation, was done by a pro-mining corporation - essentially a "lobby group", and polled only some 300 people! 300 people from Western Australia!!!???

Where exactly those people were located, who they worked for, what skin-colour they were, and how much they were blind, rough-headed employees of the mining giants, we'll never know.

But that it was thrown, quite irresponsibly into the media mix before Kevin Rudd was deposed, surely MUST bring the whole opinion poll business into the spotlight of Australia's federal Senate Committee scrutiny?

I don't remember whether their, our, THEIR ABC, included that survey in their news bulletin, but if they DID....,

HEADS SHOULD ROLE!!!

But it's clear that the ABC has played "mum" to the hard cold FACTS about the tyrannical nature of our federation, and the influences from Rome and London, at least for a few decades, if ot from their humble beginnings in the early part of the 20th century. They are, after all, the child of the British BBC?

An HUGE increase in outgoings (read "payout bribes") to the staff of the ABC, from the coffers of the global elites, of Scotland and Oxford etc, began around 1989, I think, when a certain REALPolitik chap, hand delivered a certain "ground-breaking" letter to an ABC radio announcer, at their Lonsdale Street studios (corner William).

(The next day, that ABC compare, after reading that letter, had to "throw myself down the stairs!" unquote)

Since then, the whole media organisation has been inducted to the coven of the global cabal, ex-Rome and Dunrobin, Scotland et al.

Nimbin NSW, no less.

But the evil "Theosophical Society" the cult who built me, are a wealthy and powerful club, say what, Lord Sutherland??

What is the educational and religious 'demographic' of people surveyed in opinion polls?

08/06/10.

Recently, Australian political reporting media has been set alight by two opinion polls.

The 1st, Newspoll, surveyed voters about the main parties' popularity after bad press arose surrounding the resources tax debate.

The 2nd, an SMH-Nielsen poll, went to similar issues about leadership, and, again, popularity. (As I write this, I'm offline, and have forgotten the details. Sorry.)

Since these types of polls began, there's been doubt about their veracity and accuracy, etc.

I think laws have been introduced to try to make them more impartial, so, less biased and less able to falsely influence voters.

But, whether such opinion-gathering, and thus opinion-making surveys are designed and asked by government or private organisations, it is foolish to expect that they will NOT try to glean results which favor those the pollsters support.

Especially here in an horrendously corrupt Australia.

To argue that we are not corrupt, is to be either a complete liar, who has or is making your pile through illegal means, be-it an insane profit-orientated corporation or coven or cabal, work for “the man in the big house” who owns the most land in the area and promises you 30 pieces of silver every-time he needs someone to lie in support of his treachery, or you're an absolute idiot, who knows nothing about law, politics, culture, religion, ethics and everything which comes from any or a combination of these.

Which pretty-much sums-up our society.

Nevertheless...., when one of these private opinion-pollsters does a survey, what is the demographic of those they survey?

I have the suspicion, being THE Conspiracy Theorist, as misrepresented by Mel Gibson in “Conspiracy Theory”, that these surveys have drifted back to being rather politically biased?

What proportion of surveyed people, are from Catholic, Protestant, Atheist, Buddhist, Taoist, Hindu et al cultural stand-points?

What proportion have been schooled by the church institutions, perhaps the most biased and most corrupt on earth, and what proportion have been educated - yes, also indoctrinated - in our government schools?

Then, after their schooling and perhaps tertiary educational years, what proportion of surveyed people are employed by corporations, or by government, such as for local councils? To extend this question, because it IS relevant, how many work for themselves?

How many are paying off a mortgage, renting, homeless, transient, etc?

These things matter when questioning the veracity and results from opinion-polls, methinks, because they influence the taxes people pay, the way they must interact with society, as-in what topics are discussed in their social lives, social lives which so very often, more often than is truly healthy for their minds, are more orientated around winning or keeping employment-favor than with what a “social life” should be about - that-is.., unfettered and uncontrived joy, happiness, relaxation, impartial agenda-free association.

I ask these qvestions because they, and the answers, tie to “allegiances” and therefore consequent political preferences, NOT necessarily impartial, that-is “For The Common Good” (FTCG) electoral and policy-making.

Also, how much to those polled really trust the surveyors?

Distrust is part-and-parcel of life, and media and information-gathering organisations are low on the scale of trust, so, if someone receives a telephone call from Newspoll, how much is the distrust shield going to kick-in, due to paranoias about job security, bank credibility, career ambitions, kids' educational and employment prospects, et al, and have them sway their responses one way or the other?

Most of us know there is an HUGE market for peoples' personal information, gathered by all nations' and corporations' spies, and any who have the funds, can buy whatever info they like or need, about US.

Every pollster organisation professes security in such affairs, but everyone also knows nothing is secure nowadays, especially in terms of personal information.

In the past, opinion-polls have been rudely biased.

Do we need MORE rules or legislation demanding pollsters release all these types of details with every published poll result?

Atop all that, are the polled people influenced in political affairs (YES!!!) by our and our politicians', for example, 'Catholic' religious influences?

Catholicism is seen as a bad cult lately. How much therefore, is this influencing surveyed peoples' answers, considering most Australians know that the Catholic church has been extremely strong in and behind the Australian Labor Party almost since it's inception?

Most of us, who take an interest, or are forced to take an interest in politics, and the news reports we hear, know our current PM professes to have a strong Christian faith. (Only a few days ago, I heard he was educated in a Catholic boarding school.) Most of us also know that his leadership opponent in the Liberal Party, Tony Abbott, is also Catholic.

With the Roman cult being so out-of-favor today, in being exposed as pretty-much condoning and protecting child-abusing priests, AND for being responsible for a multitude of other heinous religious and social and economic crimes, extending back some 1600 years, if not more, it's influence upon Australia's Labor Party AND it's prime supporter, our Unions, being known, it cannot not have an influence on poll results.

Back to the general theme of opinion polls.., a person who is polled by these undoubtedly biased pollster organisations, may be seriously and Genuinely Buddhist, for example, in their personal life, yet may be an executive for a large corporation.

So how Balanced (or, “Buddhist”) can they stay in decisions of office?

In Australia, a minority of white mainstream Australians would be raised Buddhist. Most Buddhist whiteys would have been converts from western religious inculcations. Both are far more likely to weigh Ethical questions as they arise than those raised, schooled, employed and still socialize in a Catholic or Christian system, society and culture.

For the western mind, it seems “faith” has done all the thinking for them, so all they usually have to do, is “ride-the-wave”, usually up the social and wealth ladders.

Questions of Ethical business practices rarely interfere with their ambition, or with their political preferences.

So how can the polity trust opinion polls to find the TRUE beliefs of those they “randomly” telephone?

And if they CAN get the true thoughts and preferences of the surveyed, in this malady-ridden nation/world, what percentage of them are well-founded, well-thought-out, Right-minded, Impartial and FTCG Wise opinions?


There can be NO doubt, that if all those polled were all Intelligent, clear-thinking, Right-minded, Impartial, and FTCG Wise, and Honest, and not at all selfish, small-minded, greedy, and psychotic, we would have polls reading preferences for a One Party, Green, Agrarian, (Vegetarian!), Socialist, Military, Union Government, funded 100% by Land Tax.

But too often the polity cannot elect what is short-and-long term BEST, because the dominant FOREIGN cults, who profit from corruption in religious beliefs, economic and banking affairs, military force, employment practices and industries, will blackmail them or the government or whomever they can, to lives of economic and social deprivation!

Clearly, our media, or THEIR media, who exploit these private-school opinion pollsters' surveys are failing the nation, almost to the point of illegally, and with treason, for accepting the polls as published, and for making headlines and endless discussions and airtime programming from their results!

And, in the end..., what effect, both on peoples' political opinions, and on election results, do these untrustworthy opinion polls have?

I assert that they do importunately influence our political elections, and thus the future government and good management or not of our nation. Not so much through their polling, nor perhaps through their publication. But because our horrendously biased news and political media make so much of them, and fill our ears and minds with gross amounts of hyperbola and speculation as to the “meaning” of the poll results.

Also, the politicians are forced to spent inordinate amounts of time, otherwise better spent doing what we pay them for, TO GOVERN, explaining and deflecting inane media qvestions about what they are gonna do, or how they are gonna repair the damage resulting to their chances from these biased and non-but-distractive opinion polls.

No! These opinion polls, and the media who jump onto them for MORE sensationalism and paid airtime, are nothing but devious and dangerous distractions against cleaning up our politics and our economy and the education of our children, and thus steering us toward some kind of a brighter future.

I don't know whether the masses here are at last rejecting the 'traditions-of-endemic-corruption', or are waking up to the utter falsity of our current political era and it's players, including our media, who in-the-main are employed to protect corruption and disgustingly illegal business, agricultural and social/cultural/religious practices, but the alleged poll results which indicate an increase in preferences for the Greens (15% & 16%), while those for the ALP and the Lib/Nats decline (down to the 30-to-40% range), may, if we can trust them to have been “well-asked”, show that at this stage in the election-campaign cycle, an increasingly influential number of punters are.

I think this is NOT due to all the hype, spin and media mileage broadcast because of these ratty opinion polls.

Indeed, I suggest that these private-schooled chappies who own and manage things like pollster companies and corporations, do so simply because they have found they have an interest in making money from peoples' opinions.

Like any in company and corporate ownership and management of resource industries, retail and product manufacturing, real estate etc etc etc., who find they can retain an interest in profiting from the masses insatiable desires, none hold high the Ultimate Ethic of “For The Common Good”.

In capitalism, this ALWAYS take preference, over the Good of All, which is why we, in this filthy-rotten corrupt nation, have a millionaire Prime Minister, unable to stand-up against the mining corporations, the dominant Catholic and Jewish cabals and the utterly demented agricultural sectors, and introduce the Good Laws and Taxations we desperately need.

But be not fooled into hating Mr Rudd and voting him or Labor out, because the other side of the gate, the Lib/Nat squad of guards of corruption, are NO better. Indeed, have we already forgotten the tyranny being instituted by the last Howard government?

In the final analysis, our current political parliamentary structure and media cabals are deeply dated and flawed, and to be allowed to continue will soon enough bring tragedy upon the next generation, and all thereafter.

Short of a Powerful - not necessarily violent - Revolution in Australia, and because the forces against a Just political structure are based overseas, and here, in the upper class echelons of the planet's economic elites, a coordinated global GRASSROOTS LAND REFORM Revolution, the only way we can ensure future Australians that there will be a future worth living for, politics and society here are headed for an horrific long-term disaster.

I, from my exile, can only hope, that our Greens can both win enough support from the Grassroots, and can grow strong enough GLOBALLY to resist all the pressures and subversions and corruptions and blackmails and skulduggery from the upper class church zombies until everyone is finally TRULY Educated to fully know and understand the unassailable Merit of living, working, playing and relaxing GREEN.

It appears, there's a lot of work to do yet....

Not so much in formulating and collating and developing Right-minded Policies for a Green Government, but in encouraging the idiots, the church-hypnotised idiots, to stop being idiots.

“Silence, is the Natural Condition of the Mind”.

Not something most puppet-masters like in their puppets. or in opinion-pollsters, or in media.........


Omaxa bin GrenBlekRed
Intelligence! Wisdom! Honor!