Showing posts with label Henry George. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Henry George. Show all posts

2010-11-04

One World Government? I DON'T think so...!

20101104

Dante Alighieri (1265-1321)

"The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in time of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality." Dante

For years I've been drawn along lines of thought, about the political solutions to world affairs. Where and when I 1st heard of 'Dante' I can't recall, but he has haunted me since. I think I bought a small booklet of Dante's thoughts on the one world government in the 1990s.

Since then, which would have been around the ten years I attended the School of Philosophy in Melbourne, thanks to the School, and to my lust for political knowledge and the rest, I've learned a lot, including the innumerable arguments against one world government, and have for years been vehemently against the centrist idea.

The School's Economics classes, shone a Light of Lights on my small store, and I remember chatting with an older, Wiser fellow student at an informal occasion, about the Henry George Economic Principle of Land Rent for Government Revenue. His words put the idea simply as “Collected by Local Councils, under a federal umbrella” or such.

This concept can be extended, admittedly, perhaps only 'for the perfect world', but which nevertheless has great merit, and should, by all Advocates be fought for, and is where current centrist structures are dissolved, down to where the Real Power, lies in Local Governments or Councils which administer their local 'turf', and are all funded by Land Rent.

With the necessary grand scheme, if-I-may, of restructuring all of our local and national affairs of government, things would in a way be turned on their heads, so that the power rests with the local councils, who, collect the Land Rent, purely for the purposes of government, and, according to issues like demographics, population and necessary development, apportion funds appropriately UP.., to the federal arena, rather than how it currently is, where the feds deem what is apportioned DOWN to the states (who shall not exist!) and local councils.

This way, where Local Councils, occupied and administered by the Locals themselves, pretty much as local councils are now, pay the federal representatives to do their thing(s), is the simplest and purest way to manage these affairs.

Nevertheless, this morning I jumped on the 'net and finally reminded myself of Dante, and to confirm his time, always thinking it was in the 12th or 13th century, went to a few websites.

(born 1265, died 1321)

Lucky for me, I was in the mood to read one or two, and found this one to my liking, mainly because it seems to agree and thus, to me, confirm my theories about the inevitable tyranny of any notions of a 'one world government'.

So, here's an extract from the “Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” website, written apparently by one 'Catherine Lu'.

(http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/world-government/)

World Government
First published Mon Dec 4, 2006

‘World government’ refers to the idea of all humankind united under one common political authority. Arguably, it has not existed so far in human history, yet proposals for a unified global political authority have existed since ancient times — in the ambition of kings, popes and emperors, and the dreams of poets and philosophers.

Proponents of world government offer distinct reasons for why it is an ideal of political organization. Some are motivated negatively and see world government as the definitive solution to old and new human problems such as war and the development of weapons of mass destruction, global poverty and inequality, and environmental degradation. More positively, some have advocated world government as a proper reflection of the unity of the cosmos, under reason or God. Proponents have also differed historically in their views of the form that a world government should take. While medieval thinkers advocated world government under a single monarch or emperor who would possess supreme authority over all other lesser rulers, modern proponents generally do not advocate a wholesale dismantling of the sovereign states system but incremental innovations in global institutional design to move humanity toward world federalism or cosmopolitan democracy.

Critics of world government have offered three main kinds of objections — to do with the feasibility, desirability and necessity of establishing a common global political authority.

First, a realist argument, forwarded by international ‘realist’ theorists, holds that world government is infeasible; ideas of world government constitute exercises in utopian thinking, and are utterly impractical as a goal for human political organization. Assuming that world government would lead to desirable outcomes such as perpetual peace, realists are skeptical that world government will ever materialize as an institutional reality, given the problems of egoistic or corrupted human nature, or the logic of international anarchy that characterizes a world of states, all jealously guarding their own sovereignty or claims to supreme authority. World government is thus infeasible as a solution to global problems because of the unsurpassable difficulties of establishing “authoritative hierarchies” at the global or international level (Krasner 1999, 42). A related consequentialist argument speculates that even if world government were desirable, the process of creating a world government may produce more harm than good; the necessary evils committed on the road to establishing a world government would outweigh whatever benefits might result from its achievement (Rousseau 1756).

Second, even if world government were shown to be a feasible political project, it may be an undesirable one. One set of reasons for its undesirability emphasizes the potential power and oppressiveness of a global political authority. In one version of this objection — the tyranny argument — world government would descend into a global tyranny, hindering rather than enhancing the ideal of human autonomy (Kant 1784). Instead of delivering impartial global justice and peace, a world government may form an inescapable tyranny that would have the power to make humanity serve its own interests, and opposition against which might engender incessant and intractable civil wars (Waltz 1979). In another version of this objection — the homogeneity argument — world government may be so strong and pervasive as to create a homogenizing effect, obliterating distinct cultures and communities that are intrinsically valuable. The institution of a world government would thus destroy the rich social pluralism that animates human life (Walzer 2004). While the preceding two arguments stem from fear of the potential power of a world government, another set of concerns that make world government undesirable focuses on its potential weakness as a form of political organization. The objections on this account are that the inevitable remoteness of a global political authority would dilute the laws, making them ineffectual and meaningless. The posited weakness of world government thus leads to objections based on its potential inefficiency and soullessness (Kant 1784).

Third, contemporary liberal theorists argue mainly that world government, in the form of a global leviathan with supreme legislative, executive, adjudicative and enforcement powers, is largely unnecessary to solve problems such as war, global poverty, and environmental catastrophe. World government so conceived is neither necessary nor sufficient to achieve the aims of a liberal agenda. Even cosmopolitan liberals do not argue that moral cosmopolitanism necessarily entails political cosmopolitanism in the form of a world government. The liberal rejection of world government, however, does not amount to an endorsement of the conventional system of sovereign states or the contemporary international order, “with its extreme injustices, crippling poverty, and inequalities” (Rawls 1999, 117). Instead, most liberal theorists envision the need for authoritative international and global institutions that modify significantly the powers and prerogatives traditionally attributed to the sovereign state.


Before I read this likeable piece, I wuz struck by an Angel's arra', which channelled a short poem down through my antenna, going to Proper Government, against that delusional elitist dream of a centrist, religious, new world order, as forced upon the world by the tyrant Rupert Murdoch and his Brettonwoods, Bilderberger, Illuminati cabals of spoiled rich, white, Christian idiots.

Here it beee....

And I would chant, 'til beyond my grave,
That “one world government will not mankind save!”

And in stead of tyrant monarch,
As dreamed by spoiled of wealth and power,
In stead of torturous military,
Pursuing each Soul, hour-by-hour,

'Tis clear to those who dive
Within to their own Divine,
That monarchs, and world leaders,
Take from all, the room to Refine,

The Simple, Purest Wisdom,
Of Good Government Local at hand,
And that not a myth of leadership
But Common Land Law for the World,
Is only Proper for all to demand.

Hyuk!

So THERE! Chew on that Dante, Bilderbergers, Illuminati, Vatican, and delusional Christians!!

And DAMN the cabalist government yes-men, and yes-woe-men of our times!!!

All Praise the Green, Agrarian, Socialist, Military, Union Alliance!!!

Thinkers Unite!!!

And Thanks to Catherine Lu for her Wise thoughts.

But..., I do fully agree with the statement by Dante which I quoted at the start of this e-ssay/post:

"The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in time of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality."

As I seemed to receive from somewhere higher than my little hovel some years ago,

"It is not anymore a question of LEADERSHIP, (nor, for that matter, a question of any religions' 'god'!), but more Properly, a matter of the Science of Simple Honest LAW, we all need, Best found in the Land itself, and in how we relate to and with It, our One True Mutha Eartha.

For, as any 'leader' or 'God' might rule with Good Laws, Good Laws are in themselves the Best and Greatest Leader, and/or 'God' for any to Obey, and to bow to.

Because, any other 'god', like any other 'leader', soon enough becomes a tyrant!"


Feeling a bit 'elevated' there. Not, my usual style, I promise!

This goes then, to the present bullshit of our so-called 'Democracy' and challenges all it's accepted ideals of government, presidents and prime ministers, etc.

The reality is that today's 'democracies' are not democratic at all, and never will be, as long as their indisputably evil cult religions of messianism, their psycho-pathological power-hungry media moguls and cabals, advertising juggernauts and puppet politicians, avoid the bottomline issue of our having HONESTLY calculated access to a piece of land upon which to build our family, lives, businesses, incomes and FOOD.

AND..., Safe, Honest Local Communities.

Anything less is tyranny!

And anything less, like today's media and political spin-and-suck-us-in, has to be shunned by everyone, and BY ANY MEANS... REMOVED!



From the Traveling 4x4 Tent of
Countryzen bin Eartha

Outlaw, for
GLOBAL
Land,
Tax,
Housing,
Agricultural,
Cult,
Drug,
Work,
Education and
Environmental
LAW REFORM

Uluruba.

2010-10-20

Heroin, marijuana, Royal College of Physicians and Afghanistan!

20/10/10.

The Royal College of Physician's ex-President Professor Ian Gilmore, now President of the Board of Trustees, appeared in an interview on BBC World News America, on 22 August 2010 or thereabouts, saying that "the world needs to take another look at 'drug laws'" (paraphrased), suggesting that our current 'legal' approach to drugs, such as marijuana and heroin have not worked.

One wonders how the British and Eurapean bankers and political-class elites have responded to his influential suggestion that some “drugs!” should be taken-off the banned list, seeing as the British Isles has been profiting from opium production, shipping and dealing for about 400 years?

Indeed, most people who take an interest in drugs like marijuana and heroin know well that governments, and opposition parties, make enormous black-market profits from them once they are made illegal.

But as the Human race is being threatened with massive reductions of their numbers by aliens invading Earth from other planets in far-off solar systems, the current drug categories which demonize the most beneficial and the most sought-after means to a nice time and make them illegal to use, seems to be a sure-fire way to rake-in the apparent funds Humanity needs to equip ourselves with the technology and weaponry to do battle with and win against the nasty little green men?

I guess it's just a bit sad that the nasty little green men were basically 'invited' to Earth by a cabal of insane and megalomaniacal British and Eurapean elites with secret societies, and too much power in the first place. Or so I was told by an Englishman, said to be an ex-MI6 operative, so I assume, was 'in-the-know'? Umm.., this piece of info may have come from the quite Credible 1976 book "Drugs Inc. British bankers and Soviet Commissars"?

Of course, if they had too much power, they'd have won against WHO? The Catholics? The Americans? Aliens? The Workers of the World? Or perhaps against the Honorable Islamists?

But perhaps, as I keep insisting, they were in fact always doing battle with their own minds, sent well-out-of-control centuries ago by a Zionist cabal of landless and thus REALLY bitchy (behind your back) and pathologically twisted Jews?

From the outside, I'm left to debate with my own mind, whether the Battle-Royale, for the planet's real estate is, in this 3D reality (it is reality?) between the dominant psychos of Brit-Eurape and the rest of the species, the rest of us being the non-white members, or between the Brit-Euronuts and extraterrestrials?

Somehow, my sceptical and pro-scientific mind, cautiously errs with Earth's two or more sides, rather than believing the fantastically frightening stories about alien invasions from the 'Orion' star system over.... THERE!

But what can we believe today, now that the demons of the occult are out-of-the-bag, and everyone is entranced by one or many bewitching tales, left to believe whomever gets to them first?

--=oOo=--

The British East India Company, which 'coalesced' in about the 18th century, and has made squillions from opium and latterly heroin, for at least 400 years, which rebranded itself as the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, in about the 1920s, from memories of a book I read, has had it's powerful hands on the levers of global economics, and witchcraft for perhaps 500 years.

Magic as-it-happens, is quite bewitching, quite entrancing, and once the third eye is opened in the mind of those without Wisdom, that-is without a Sound upbringing and Initiation into adulthood, basically takes-over the consciousness of the person.

This is almost always initiated by another witch, either known or not to the newby, who thereafter has the person in their clutches as their puppet.

This is what the Christian/Catholic 'baptism' is about, aside from covertly draping a veil over the nubile baby's mind to protect them from the world of Spirits.

For the puppet master to maintain their hold on the person's mind, it is important that they continue to ply the person's mind with whatever it takes to keep their Soul in that 'stasis', and thus in allegiance with the master's wishes and 'purpose'.

This is precisely what Christianity has always been about. Nothing to do with 'Educing' the Knowledge and Higher Wisdom for the path to Enlightenment from within the Soul. Christian 'faith' is a spell about accepting whatever the apparent 'authority' says as true, so-as to have a mass of slaves.

The adept puppet master/witch is able to make any sort of rubbish sound correct (the American 'Tea Party' leaders?), and can convince other people to believe, see and to do amazing things, without the person even realising what evil they are the recipients of, nor what they are doing, and without the person realising that they are hypnotised at all.

In the middle years of the 19th century, the world's most wealthy people of Britain and Eurapean and Russian elite allies, conspired to form secret societies, because, I am left to assume, their travels opened their eyes to the coming chaos of an over-active, overly militarised and over-populated world.

Most of Britain's and Eurape's celebrated writers, philosophers, politicians, wealthiest industrialists, and poets, were either 'brought in' to these covert societies or were 'made' by them, to aid in the elite's worldwide conspiracy to secure their inheritances, their lands, colonies and industries et al for themselves, and for their progeny.

“By any means” might have been their cabal's adage or motto.

These super-wealthy cabals went Hell-for-leather at conquering all opposition in industry, military, colonial plunder and possession, and determined, soundly or not, that 'by any means' was a justified path to follow.

Thus, with the eloquent minds of the celebrated writers, massive stories were fabricated.

Perhaps the most influential being HG Wells' “War of the Worlds” about the world being invaded by aliens.

If a person, or a mass of people have been roped into being under a witch-coven's spells, they are usually unable to discern whether anything they see or hear or feel is real or not.

Being non-the-wiser of the spells they are under, they usually have no reason to doubt their senses, and so when something manifests to them, they respond, I suppose, 'rationally' as anyone would.

The heights of pleasure can be exaggerated in them, or, in their mind, by their master, as can the depths of terror.

So as most of us are under some spell, or 'bank' of spells, or another, most cast upon us to keep us stupid and subservient, even when we are informed about magic, and that it is running rampant across the globe in minds extremely ill-equipped to have access to it's energy, it's powers, whatever we do, to both protect ourselves from it, or to employ it, for our own benefit or to ward-off others, we are dabbling in the darkest realms of illusion.

In this muddy pool, things can appear real, or at least able to effect us, depending upon the strength of the projector, and upon our own ability to see it for what it really is - illusion.

But, as the world has been consumed by the witchcraft of the most materially powerful nations and so-labelled 'religious beliefs', who can therefore also make Hell for us if we refuse their demands and offers, few if any of us can Stand True and defy the darkness from conquering our Souls.

Aided and abetted by the world's elite print media and more recent innovations of electronic media, the global elites have us pretty-much all by the balls, and continue relentlessly to ply us with bullshit about every sort of threat possible to imagine.

In my alienated existence, I'm left to believe that extraterrestrial 'aliens' are perhaps the most effective terror possible to imagine, and with the abuse of the occult, supported by the greatest bullshit factories known to mankind - Hollywood and the Murdoch media empire - we are seduced, or electrified in our nerve-ends to see, hear, feel and believe they are here in numbers, and threaten us with extinction.

But...., I might be very very wrong?

As the Hebrews have had a bitch against most every other nation owned and run by it's 'landed gentry', for some 6,000 years, and as Judaism's earliest books tell of the threat, as far back as Moses' times, from the mob I call 'the golden calf tribe', who, sought to win the gold 'by any means' so abuse of magic was on, and also tells of Moses' and Aaron's mastery of the occult, with which they secured the Israelite's freedom from the Egyptian elite, we can be certain that with Rome's global march and domination, spurred-on from behind the temple by the Hebrew rabbi-witches, almost none-of-us are above the terrors the masters of magic use to keep us selling-the-farm. To THEM.

In matters of gaining and securing wealth, most of us are unaware of how the mind becomes twisted.

If we must fight day-in-day-out merely for food and a roof, etc., madness and immorality always threaten. Especially when we have no choice but to live in a society and a culture where such corrupted and contorted methods of survival and winning prosperity are the 'norm'.

If we are born into a sub-group of the species who has been denied secure land, and the incumbent benefits, for most of their history, a cultural psychosis, I believe, cannot help but overtake their minds.

All manner of psycho-pathological disorders cannot help but manifest, in some parts of the tribe, and nation.

'Technology' we enjoy today, was inspired and brought to fruition mostly by 'clever Jews', just as they 'divined' how to split the atom, and thereafter to make atomic bombs.

As the 'apparent' threat of aliens continues to haunt Humanity, even while we have progressed our weaponry to unbelievable extents, it seems that the threat grows in tandem with our militaristic advances?

As the g.c.t has infiltrated all our military, corporate, political AND media levels, and, with the help of extraterrestrials or not, have us all running scared, apparently toward our own doom, it would appear that we are lost, and that there's nothing we can develop in weaponry, to save us.

Therefore, getting back to the opener of this rant, demonising and making illegal, relatively harmless 'drugs' like opium, cocaine and marijuana, et al, so the world's governments can afford, behind the taxman and scenes, to accrue the funds enough to build alien-obliterating weapons quite simply, DOES NOT ADD UP!

IF...? Aliens ARE a genuine threat to we pitiful Earthlings, I put it that this has become so, purely because the advancers of a technocentric species, the Hebrew and branch-offices of Freemasons and Christianity, have lost-the-plot, etc., for having been so dangerously dumbed-down and thus unwise, for centuries, if not for thousands of years, to the point where some 1.5 BILLION 'believers' now have no Wisdom, nor any control of their own minds!

However...., from my learnings... I am inclined to settle on the theory (running on the probable pretext that NOTHING IS REAL, so there are no facts) that this deceptively lovable planet, this 3-dimensional planet, is but some macabre form of 'prison planet' for Souls from elsewhere in our galaxy who have erred, up there in Alpha Centauri, Krypton..., or another cluster of life-forms and occupiable habitats.

So, whatever we do here, in terms of defending the planet and ourselves from aliens, we are for-it!

Perhaps this justifies lawlessness, and thus horrendously errant 'laws' banning drugs which can only, in the right environment, advance our personal Spiritual Enlightenment?

Whatever...

The evidence seems clear enough though, that further demonising of marijuana and heroin in particular, to apparently fund the war between Catholic aliens and Freemason aliens, is a no-win scenario, and as is happening in Mexico's drug-cartels war, and in Afghanistan, can only make the world one big round warzone, aliens or not.

As for HG Wells' 'War of the Worlds', published I think in the late 1800s, it was timely.

Around the same time, the AMERICAN newspaper owner, Journalist/Philosopher/Economist, Henry George, was making enormous headway right around the world with his exquisite defining of the world's most deadly crime of 'inequitable land ownership and distribution', and about the Most Honorable and Scientific means to 'Rebalance' the books, through the most simple 'Land Rent for Government Revenue.

While Wells' book was published before electronic media, of radio, it was available and no doubt read by many, especially in the 'modern worlds' of Britain, Eurape and the north America.

One unsolved mystery from the late 1800s, was the unexpected and possibly untimely death of Henry George on the eve of his being elected, apparently expected to be a 'landslide victory', as Mayor of New York City in 1899.

He had already traveled the world promoting this Wisdom and his literature, as he'd written greatly on the incorruptible 'Economic Rent' over the previous thirty years, deduced and written about by David Ricardo in England in the early 1800s (1810), and so, to the masses, from Australia to Scotland, and even to the east, and across America, he was a hero of Mammoth proportions.

Mahatma Gandhi was an Advocate of his Economics, and in Australia, the earliest of our Unionists and even rural Shearers, dedicated their lives and works to this.

Indeed, in Australia, the Australian Labor Party was formed around these very Tenets of Social - ECONOMIC - Justice.

So, the elites of the world, wherever the western hegemons had reached, were worried that their extremely opulent lifestyles, financed by the evils of colonialism, and upper-crust cultures, were threatened.

None of them could see life any other way than with a severely divided class-based society, and, with them, on top.

According to the elites, and to their 'secret societies', whence grew today's military intelligence organisations and secret services, something major had to be done, and not just in Philadelphia, where George was born, or in San Francisco, where he ran a newspaper, or in New York where he met his maker, but globally.

Thus the mechanisms were set in motion, to make the political world ready for a big, big war.

However, they were known about by the Advocates for a Just world, who fought-on Gallantly.

In my years of gaining some Wisdom about the horrors of the world of politics, one Noble Warrior, of some years, back then, told me that there are 'rumours', perhaps based on hidden facts, that a young member of the English parliament, one Winston Churchill, upset the lordal pidgeons of Westminster in 1908, by attempting to introduce a reform Bill which went to this very issue, of collecting government revenue from an equitably formulated Land Tax, according to the ancient and perennial 'law of rent'.

It cannot be ignored that this and George's increasing popularity around the world, sent the paranoid, often inbred, insane and extremely self-centred British and western elites into a frenzy, enough to turn a few knobs to start the first world war in 1914.

So, 'by any means' at no matter what the cost to life and country, meant that millions of Good Men, Working Class Men, went to a false war and fell, merely to save the spoiled lifestyles of the world's wealthiest landlords.

So too, today, are millions jailed under insane and unjustifiable laws which make it nigh-on impossible to find some harmless solace, in their own homes, when they have one, with marijuana and/or heroin. Or cocaine.

Australians who 'celebrate' Gallipoli each 25th April, are urged to re-evaluate their allegiances, in light of the tragic facts that thousands of our Soldiers/Warriors were sent to certain death on the beaches of Turkey, both to deplete the Australian polity and young men of their Natural Courage, by serving us with a hit we clearly still have not overcome, and to deflate our otherwise natural climb to national independence from the British, Eurapean and Zionist elite's evil psychosis of colonialist land ownership.

An Independence which, if the Australian Advocates for Henry George's Land Rent for Government Revenue, the clear-minded and Honorable Unionists and others, would have made us the envy of the REAL world, of the Human majority, with the most modern Republic, basing our economy on a National Land Tax.

The very same National Land Tax as recommended by Dr Ken Henry in last December's 'Henry Tax Review'.

Sending our troops to Afghanistan, is a softer version of Gallipoli, where we are depleted of our Warriors who might otherwise be willing and able to Stand True on our own soils, and support any Military, Political or Workers Stand for a Just and Independent Australia.

LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS!

PROHIBITION KILLS!

When a voice like Professor Ian Gilmore of the Royal College of Physicians deduces that the laws banning heroin and marijuana are not supportable by evidence, and are known to be failures, as well as deadly threats to people of all nations and classes, it would appear that the 'authorities' will be Wise to listen AND to act to repeal them.

If the last word rests with the IMF, and if they do not take reformist action by making at least marijuana, cocaine and.., AND heroin legal, then the world is lost to tyranny and insanity, to more dangerous kitchen-laboratory drugs than any naturally-grown Herbs and opiates, and we will know that they and their coalitions are not at all interested in making the world anything but a filthy, immoral profit-centred warzone!

From the Travelling 4x4 Tent of
Countryzen bin Eartha

Outlaw, for
GLOBAL
Land,
Tax,
Housing,
Agricultural,
Cult,
Drug,
Work,
Education and
Environmental
LAW REFORM

Uluruba.

2010-10-08

Gangs......

07/10/10..

Living outside society, as I have in fact, done for most of my adult life, watching programs on the Crime and Investigation Channel through Foxtel-on-mobile, which documents investigations about America's “Gangs”, I s'pose I should be shocked by what I see?

The officers of any of the authorities, who are interviewed, seem to agree that there is no way the Gangs can be closed-down or eliminated from US society. As one says, “the best they can do is slow-them-down a bit”.

Somewhere on these programs I heard that there are about 500 gangs (or was it 5,000!?) in the USA.

All, we assume, are Outlaws, in their having to resort to 'crime' merely to survive.

From my point-of-view, these 'criminal gangs exist purely because of 'capitalism', because of the failure of the culture, of the society, to ensure all members are supported with at least the essentials of food, water, housing, clothing and as-they-say 'gainful employment'.

I reckon this happened simply because the societies became too big to manage. And oversized societies seem to have been a result of erroneous ideologies being held tenaciously to, by the leaders. Or, by their upper, 'political class'.

All but a few having their basis in the 4th century AD Roman untruths we now call “Christianity”.

Of course, in the first stages of whichever society, such as the USA, and I think most other 'immigrant' nations, the leaders were probably under-qualified to fully manage the tasks involved. Mainly because the tasks, added together, were too big for ANY small clique of 'leaders' to manage.

Most leaders in these types of new nations, etc, inherited their positions, because their parents or families were the wealthiest, thus, had some element of control of the militias and of trade, etc.

So, it might be that from the beginning, modern immigrant nations as we have come to accept them, were fatally-flawed from the start?

Again, in the example of the USA, there would have been no-way any of the first leaders, their military generals, their leading families or even first business owners could have controlled all the most important 'fundamentals', mainly because of the huge influx of new citizens, and the unmanageable spread, from the first-landing ports.

Also, from the beginning, the immigrants to the USA came from innumerable and very different cultures and even 'race-types'.

It's ironic that the original occupants, the Aborigines, the 'Indians', the first Americans, whose nations grew lo-ongtime-back, from immigrant nomads, used to having to have a well-regulated society from ancient times, had long-earlier established Traditions which ensured all the fundamentals of their growing nations were held-to, so overpopulation and resultant over-use of resources etc., never occurred?

But, as I asserted in another blog-post recently, Australia, and in this example, America, was/were invaded by the Eurapeans and British who were already well out-of-control culturally, and so, psychologically.

(A stories remains of one of Australia's Aborigine Peoples' 1st encounter with the British invaders, which tells of the pompous British exploration leader commanding the Aborigine men to pick-up and carry their bundles of stores for them, as they ventured into the northern outback.
The Aborigines, near-naked, with everything they needed to survive happily and in-abundance wherever they travelled - a few spears, boomerangs, flints, grass carry bags, etc., etc., - politely, but firmly declined, and instead, just turned their backs to the British party, and wandered back into the desert, laughing at the silly fools all dressed-up in thick red and white uniforms, funny hats, carrying heavy guns and packs and equipment, fumbling and incompetent, afraid of surviving without too much stuff!)

So there and here, there was only one way the new nations could possibly develop - erroneously.

Erratically. In ways which could only grow to being totally out of control.

Witness..., 'Astrayliar' today!

The first whites to land and settle in Australia and the USA, were in my harsh analysis, already quite insane, coming as they had, from a long-awry Eurapean culture of warring and petty monarchies and with their religions way-off-the-mark when it comes to Knowing and holding-fast to the Principles of the Enlightened - Right-thought, Right-action, and Sound, Intelligent and Wise Beliefs.

If these thoughts of mine are near-to-correct, then no-one can denigrate or incriminate any of today's 'Gangs' for existing, and, for being forced, by the descendants of the 'first leaders', into street-fighting to survive.

Because that is all 'crime' really is - a response by a person, to their need to fight in an inhospitable, dishonorable and corrupt society and culture, merely to survive, let alone prosper.

Besides, who are the real and biggest and most heinous criminals, but the leaders who put their own interests before the interests of the group, Tribe, and Nation?

Indeed, as most white Australians refuse to openly admit and make ANY attempt to conciliate, these two examples of 'immigrant nations', and we can include all the modern nations of South America, Africa and others, were established by the worst crims of all - the ruthless, genocidal colonialists from O! Britain and Eurape.

So is it any real wonder that, in places like Astrayliar and the Untied (TYPO?) States of America, corrupt laws prevail and force Gangs into existence?

And..., as the first invaders to such as Astrayliar and America might have come with good intentions (“...the road to Hell is paved with Christian intentions!”), and even with good laws and ideologies (NOT!) about how to build a nation, it is now clear that they were incapable of dealing Wisely with all the complications that must come with such a phenomenon.

It's easy to criticise after the fact, but it boggles the mind to think about how stupid the Brits and Eurapeans were to presume that they could simply graft their already dire cultures and long-rotten laws onto a new territory, still occupied by the Rightful Original owners, while refusing to recognise the First Principles of Good and Sound Culture, of Right-minded Land Laws.

Rightminded Land Laws which do not change wherever people go, and settle.

This alone confirms that the first Eurapeans and their culture, were already quite dangerously insane, and why America and Australia are now apparently irreversibly in 'DESTRUCTO-mode', with absolutely nothing of the culture being CON-structive.

Futility cannot help but overcome one, on seeing this sad state-of-affairs, when it is these crazy peoples and their clearly deeply-awry Brit-Eurapean cultures, who have so much control over the psychological and material health of the whole planet.

I have no doubt, that most leaders of today's Gangs, wherever we look, see these realities clearly, and I have no doubt that on-top-of the dominant cults' abandoning their Peoples to fend for themselves, “..by-any-means...”, these simple, yet HARD Truths, give those denied a Just life by a totally unjust upper class, the impetus to form a Gang.

And..., what are today's police forces, but the street gangs of the upper classes, out fighting every other far more Honorable Gang, with totally undeserved authority tickling their arses from behind high-class walls (that-is, being paid the classic, biblical '30-pieces-of-silver', to betray their own people!), equipped with their nicely-ironed blue-shirts, badges and guns?

The main reason the softcock middle and upper classes of Astrayliar and the Untied States of America fear the rise of Gangs, is because their own betrayers of the People - the owners of mainstream media (hello Rupert-dear!) - have come from the long-and irreparably-corrupt upper classes, as wealthy as they are through utterly corrupt culture and laws, essentially originally of Rome, and now live fearful of Justice.

True Justice.

As today's scientific evidence confirms beliefs I've found decades ago, and adhered-to, that without SERIOUS REFORMS to the planet's religious cultures, economic and environmental laws and education curricula, everyone's future, perhaps two years hence, perhaps two decades hence, perhaps 5-to-10 decades hence, will be a right royal shitfight, caused by BAD LAND LAWS, and upheld and enforced by the deeply insane, criminally self-interested judicial, legal, policing, political and priestly classes. Not all of them.

Therefore, no-one (in their Right mind) can deny the Right of each and every so-called 'Outlaw' Gang Member to rebel against the dominant culture of the 'west' (the 'wild-west' indeedy!), in order to either bring-it-down, or to wake the dickheads up, in the top chairs of such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, United Nations, and each major nation, to institute the Proper Laws worldwide.

And, of course, the Proper Laws are Property Laws, or, how Humans cooperate Properly, in our relationship with the Great Mother Eartha.

So...

YO! GANGSTA!

Time to stop fighting each other!

Yo' KNOW, it's (almost all) about Yo' Turf.

Yo' Patch!

Room-to-Move..., Freely, to get food and a roof, Laughter and Leeerve (whatever THAT is?)

AND...

You ALL..... KNOW what to do!

Gangs, are on the rise, and cannot be stopped.

As we're all in the fastlane to the shithole sewer, best we, that-is o'course, EVERYONE.... gets together and settle on a new paradigm of the ESSENTIALS.

And the ESSENTIALS on this one small-and-smaller planet, our only Planet, the Great Mutha Eartha, all rest on True, Scientific and JUST, LAND LAW.

Yo..! Over there in the Great America, Yo have those Laws written by Yo're OWN Champion for Justice, the Great Henry George, once a citizen of San Francisco!

So.., being some strange Guru to some Gangstas, I call Yo' all to buy (AYE! don' steal this one!) MISTA George's Brilliant, from the Heart, Treatise called “Social Problems”, and do what Yo KNOW Yo gotta do!

THIS..! Is what being an Outlaw and Gangsta is all about!

JUSTICE! Brothers and Sisters!

White! Bleck! Hispanic! Porto Rican! Asian!

Whoever! From Wherever! AT wherever!

America! Astrayliar! Africa! Asia! Europe and Britain! Mars and Venus!

There's no need for further blood.

Enough worldwide Resistance to corrupt laws, by Gangstas and Warriors for a Better World, won't fully stop the general global decline, but, it will slow it down heaps, and set the groundwork for our future generations to Know that True Land Laws are Fundamental to Good and long-lasting Traditions, Culture, and some idea of Livin' a Happier Life, no matter what confronts us.

And we who Fight and Fall for Honor, will Know we can cross the big river to the unknown, fearless of any bad karma comin' 'round to bight us.

We all hate the coppers! But they are slaves to the higher powers in the local county, state or federal governments.

If the “Streets” keep Guided Pressure up on the local police, thus on the upper classes who profit so unethically from BAD LAND LAWS, and if this is the same Dissent across the nations, and (in the Ideal Gangsta World) across the planet, the biggest powers will have to surrender their dumb and deadly ideologies, and through Pure Democracy, the Strength of the Warriors of the Streets, governments AND their militia will have to Correct the laws.

And, finally, to be able to Unite, across America, and, of course, across the globe, Yo gotto make the political world sit-up and listen!

But not with MORE violence!

Every Gangsta has a Duty, a basic part of Honor, to VOTE, for the Wisest, Most Intelligent, so, the Most Honorable Politicians who would make Just Land Law, National, Constitutional LAW, if they were asked to, by their People.

Yo! Gangsta! One Tribe working in Harmony across the USA POLITICALLY, is the Best and the Mightiest Force for America!

But, Yo! Gotto do the Groundwork first!

Yo KNOW what to do!


An' each night, before Yo go to bed, sing a short “ALL PRAISE, THE GREAT, THE JUST, MISTA HENRY GEORGE!”

An' read the kids, his book “Social Problems”, just for lil' ol' me.


From the Travelling 4x4 Tent of
Countryzen bin Eartha

Outlaw, for
GLOBAL
Land,
Tax,
Housing,
Agricultural,
Cult,
Drug,
Work,
Education and
Environmental
LAW REFORM

Uluruba.

2010-06-15

Mining Tax? Whose argument is Right?

15/06/10.

Australia's media is being swamped, as we draw closer to the 2010 federal election, with advertising and opinions about the goods and the bads of the government's proposed mining resources “super-profits” tax.

Being one with something of an impartial interest in such matters, matters which short-and-long term influence the well-being of the poorer people, I am fast tiring of the “blurb”.

Blurb which comes from utterly incredible sources, such as the billionaire mining magnate, Gina Reinhardt, and one of her uptop cronies in mining, Clive Palmer, neither of whom, in my opinion, have any right to make the slanderous and blatantly untrue comments against the current government's attempts to make Australia a better Economically, more Equitably-managed nation.

On 6th June, after Palmer had made untrue statements to media about what his company is doing in reaction to the proposed tax, he backed-down. This adds to his being a non-credible source in the debate, on top of his having clearly very self-interested motives, as does Georgina Rinehart, who rides the wave of ridiculously excessive wealth inherited from the deceased iron-ore magnate Lange Hancock.

What inspires a women of her calibre to get-on the tray of a truck and with a loud-hailer chant with self-interested employees, at least in the fields of mining, if not in her pay, and if not “rent-a-protest”, will not be fathomed, for clearly she and her fellow chanters are not in the least bit interested in the nation's overall capital interest, and therefore will never give a frank, honest admission.

But with her are the uptop, upclub, upemselves lobbyists, primarily of the totally corrupt, which translates as mentally ill, right wing of the Australian sycophants' clubs, most represented in the public eye by our utterly unqualified, obstructionist parliamentary Opposition, led by the lately unheard Tony Abbott.

The hubris of these mining magnates, Andrew Forrest another, is what we have come to expect from the super-wealthy, but nevertheless will never, in the light of Balance and Reason, give them any more credibility.

However this raw fact does not stop them from paying any media outlet, or advertising and consulting corporation to say the most outrageous things.

Outrageous because to even the dullest minds, they are talking out of turn, that-is they are saying things which could, could, have very negative ramifications on the future welfare of a large section of the Australian population.

It is unquestionably very irresponsible of them to so vociferously say what they do.

In this easy-access-to-media day-and-age, this is one of the negative results, where, if you have enough money, SOMEONE will take it to get your opinion “on-air”.

So...?

While being exiled from the post of leading a military take-over of the British royal throne, and thus of the world, I keep my sanity (UMMMM?) by watching these in-the-end, in the perfect world, unnecessary debates, arguments, media-blasts, and do this....

In regard to the title of this post, I personally have no doubts as to not who, but which debate is correct. That I am also somewhat poor in absorbing and understanding “details” of economic treaties and prognostications, means that I must admit to not fully in-taking the intricacies of such as the government's plans.

This therefore means I cannot stand to advocate the plan, but defer to the far more astute minds of, highly qualified economists, such as one Bryan Kavanagh, a quietly-spoken Champion, who was then, and perhaps still is, a Land Valuer, and whom I met years ago at the 31 Hardware Street Melbourne offices of the Henry George League.

Another is another quietly-spoken bloke, er-Champion, Phillip Anderson, who began “Economic Indicator Services” (EIS) while we were associating as drinking and Philosophising mates and who has since taken EIS to great and respected heights, with, it seems, it's head office in London England.

Bryan apparently regularly sits in with a Warrior of the airwaves on Melbourne's Community Radio 3CR, Karl Fitzgerald's “Renegade Economists”, and recently, on 05/05/10, spoke on the show of how happy he and his Economist fellows - REALEconomist Fellows, finance-people of the Highest Order, were with what Dr Ken Henry put out in his Henry Tax Review for the federal government.

Phil, I much later found out, via a random search of the web, was interviewed representing EIS on SkyBusiness channel
on 18th Aug 2009, where he gave a succinct explanation of “boom and bust” economic cycles, and their intimate relationship with “land values”.

So, having been “blessed” with these associations in the last century, and having myself attended some REALPolitik and REALEconomics tutorials at a very well-qualified school in Melbourne (The School of Philosophy), I find I'm short on tolerance of all our mainstream media when they make sensationalist airtime headlines about the clearly corruption-centred outbursts and what amount to “blackmail” by the upper-end of our national economy, and opinion-polls which cannot tell the real picture of how the majority of Australians feel about what is theft of our wealth and resources as stolen by the in-the-main offshore monetary interests.

So, having recently staggered onto the “Indymedia” website, and quickly took in it's perceived thrust ( I also met some of their watchers/contributors in Nimbin, and was not impressed), after leaving the “Green Left” mobs to their own cliques of radical private school “outlaws” if-not mere drop-outs, who generally will not go outside of the church's ideological boundaries, and increasingly concerned about the mileage the mainstream corruption is getting via the mainstream and thoroughly agenda-ridden - read-corrupt media, I get “agitated” and want SOMEONE to put it in plain English, or “Globe-ish” as I recently heard it called, and cut through the agendas and the slime and the spin and the blah and the politrix of the era, which if SOMEONE does not cut with Straight and True tongues soon, might be our last, for any upward opportunity.

It seems to me, that our media is out of control, and has possibly always been thus, because it is mainly about keeping us stupid so that the British and Eurapean elites can keep ripping the resources and wealth from under Australians feet.

That they keep doing this to us surely opens the door of the courts for charges of treason, by, that-is against our media for lying to us, and for NOT going to THE FACTS, which are so eloquently and calmly spoken about by such as the Champions of the Henry George League and it's many, many affiliate organisations, here and in nearly every major city in the world.

Indymedia and Green Left are vulnerable of being also implicated in these types of charges, for the same offences, as well of course with about every other media outlet in Australia.

It was a surprise that Sky Business, a Fox-Murdoch channel did the interview with Phil Anderson, and must be commended for it. But they surely remain on the uptop, upemselves, upclub side of the HONEST ECONOMICS divide.

How many of Australia's Community Radio stations go to these issues without fear or favour I don't know. Nimbin's NIM-FM was all about “other issues” let's say, mainly of keeping the drop-out upclubsters in the pulse of modern and mostly very high quality music, some Marijuana related hours were put in, but also many a code was sent out as warnings of police raids, immigration parties and “doofs”, rather than ANY REALPolitik or REALEconomic airtime.

Years ago, when the subversives started infiltrating the left-wing youth political orgs in Melbourne, I watched Community Radio take a dive and turn trivial.

But as attested to by Renegade Economists on 3CR, it may be that the Righteous, with or without daddy's inheritance and a few upper-suburban houses to loiter in, have taken back the territory in our more local, Community media.

As to whether the same is even possible in the probably-dwindling “local” or suburban print media market and editors' rooms, I doubt it?

As for TV.....? Somehow, I suspect that the few who have managed to get broadcast licences for local, Community television, would go with REALEconomics televisings, but thus far, as-in of the last 2-or-20-thousand years, the thugs in the pay of the bighouse and real estate mobsters have kept them off air.

And besides, what percentage of the viewers do the small stations, radio, internet and TV, get? Not a majority, that's-a-for-a-sure?

So, how do we convince the mainstream media to GET REAL!?

I used to attend the School of Philosophy, who have “students” of all ages, right across the nation and across the world.

Most of them, then, were from the upper echelons of society.

Pretty, in the end, self-absorbed, so were not the kind one would expect to get out on the streets and march in a protest or demonstration.

This is a tragic shame really, because they were then, quite ahead of the rest of Australian society in terms of doing the Work any Genuine Philosopher would know they must, hour-by-hour, do.

Stay “in the present moment” Etcetera.

Meditation was an integral part of their daily events, regime, morning and night, as well as much given time to assist at the School, one because iot was essentially run by volunteers, but also because it was the place to be for that irreplaceable “Good Company”, where humour was enjoyed with the Highest Integrity, and the deepest issues were the main reason for attendance.

There too, were the courses on this Land Economics. An Economic Philosophy unsurpassed and of which the current debate about resources tax and the theft by offshore and self-interested mining magnates is, in fact, centred.

So it strikes me that these schools, and the several thousand who attend, while recommended to not jump-up-and-down in public about the True Taxation Science of Land Rent, would be highly effective were they to ORGANISE themselves out of their usually “cushy” positions of employment, and arrange a NON-POLITICAL, for that is rightly, what they and the School are, public protest against all the misinformation being thrown around by the, treasonous media, and political opposition.

NON-POLITICAL, because the core of their Economic Philosophy, goes way above all our in reality fabricated political divisions.

Political divisions which, as likely, ALL our mainstream media, do not want commonly known, because it would kill-off most of their moneymaking schemes.

Schemes, agendas, which ARE NOT, for the Good of All!

Having been exiled from that School in 1995, by subversives-anonymous, I do not know where they in general stand today.

Then the advice, and Good Advice, was to keep our head low, for it is a major thing, and has always attracted much antipathy, again, from the utterly corrupt bighouse mobs.

Today, things ARE different, and a hefty proportion of the power has shifted to the Common People. People who have always been Outlawed for refusing to bow to the dominant paradigm. So I put it that those in such as the School can now safely speak out or march out in support of the most Important and Vital Economic Issue of our time.

Land and Tax Reform.

Therefore, surely as this farcical debate rages nationwide, without waiting in futility for a messiah to lead them, there must be significant enough Right-minded People from all classes with enough mettle, and with the right contacts, to organise the polity to call for an end to the stupidity of false assertions by such as the mining lobby, et al, by standing in force FOR the Proper, as in Property, systems of Taxation and Economic Reform.

Whether the offshore interests can muster enough corrupt ferment to incite a war or not, there are few options available to Humanity today, but to Stand, Shoulder-to-Shoulder and to give our government the confidence to get through the reforms we all need.

Unions, Outlaws, Radicals, Gangsters, Clubsters, Environmentalists, Business-owners and Employees, Aborigines, and generally concerned and enwisened People, can Rule the Streets, once, and For All.

Fear nothing, I say, for you all, have "The Angels" on your side!

So Mote It Be!

Omaxa bin Eartha.
Outlaw, for
GLOBAL Land, Tax, Cult, Drug and Work
LAW REFORM.