130205 JUST
DEFIANCE Outlaw Junction Dropping The Legal Cat Into The Political
Pigeons Roost Edition
and
I
read late last night, an article at the 1st
link above, and so scribed the piece in purple,
underneath this 1st
red section. But it's all been edited now Tuesday arvo...
According
to the 2nd linked article above, Rudd says he's still
supporting Gillard..
Cool.
That's how we'd expect him to be. Going through the leadership
rubbish again would be hard for the ALP and for voters to then stay
or become loyal.
Rudd's
doing the right thing, for Gillard, for her concerns for the party,
and for the party.
But
that does not align with how the voters see it.
If
her popularity is as low as it is, with no sign of recovery, then
options have to be considered.
Rudd
is the obvious option, whether he, she or the cabinet wants it, him.
But
the decision has to be made pronto, about
where Rudd should be.
Letting
speculation and the right wing, in the dropposition, media and the
mining lobby drag it on, is deadly.
Obviously not because of any
merit in what the right wings will trumpet to the voters – there is none - but
merely because they “have ways” of
further fooling the masses, or enough of a percentage of them, to not
vote for the current government.
Any
damage done by going through another leadership ballot, can only be
repaired by the ALP/Greens/Independents government Uniting on the
biggest issues, and pushing for all it's worth at bringing them to
the very front of the election debate/s.
As
I write in earlier blogposts, from my view, those big issues demand
Righteous and Fearless assaults on both the media ownership laws,
and the rights or not, of mining magnates et al, to buy their way into
media, and thus into twisting the REALPolitik debates to their selfish favor, and away from any
most important politico-economic FACTS.
FACTS,
which underlie the mining magnates' and multinational corporations',
a la Rio Tinto, BHP-Billiton, etc., control of not, perhaps,
so much the ownership of the land, but of the unjust theft of the
mining, minerals and resources profits, away from the True
owners of the Land, both the Aborigine, of course, but also, the
Native white and other Australians.
Another
ishooo, has surely to be the mental health of some, if not all
of the days' super-wealthy?
Because,
just from video footage, and from comments made by some of them, it
is blatantly clear that they do have mental health issues, which,
1,
they have to address. (However...., I posit that to be an
impossibility, for their being so deeply entrenched in their own
piles of wealth), and
2,
which must, in any sane world, bring into question their instability
of mind, and that they have as much influence on the broader
national, economic, and political, affairs involving the nations'
peoples' welfare.
It
is a blatant crime that these two matters are ignored by the
politicians, the media and by the public alike. Which may in fact, simply show that they too , that-is, the majority of people in the middle-to-upper class 1st world, suffer from the same "richness-sickness"? Another word for it is "materialism". A biblical word for it was "mammon".
Then,
of course, as put in previous e-ssays going to this same issue, there
are the “professionals” in mental health, who should be placing
this class-mental-health-issue debate and fact, at the front of all their mental
health concerns, especially regards the well-being of the lower
classes who're deemed in need of being placed in psyche-wards, and in
psychological or psychiatric treatment and care, etc. Simply because, I say, that the vast majority of mental health issues inflicting the lower classes, are caused by the same more deeply-effected upper-classes.
But
as I write, the main sticking point stopping the “professionals”
from addressing this “wealth-psychopathy” reality, is that they
too come from the very same upper-echelon classes and private-schooling
layers, and, fraternities. So they were essentially born into
suffering the same disorders.
Therefore,
1, they cannot get to the core of this mental disease, for it is what
has them follow the lines they do and the approaches and beliefs and
dogma they have imbibed through their upper class tertiary training,
and
2, there's unquestionably masses of pressure on these mental
health professionals to “not go there!!!”
from their social peers.
Nevertheless,
the evidence being quite "out there" that this “wealth-psychopathy” or
“richness-sickness” is rife across all elite classes,
here, there and globally, and of course, infects perhaps the most of
our upperclasshole “political classes” too, does not mean it
cannot, nor should not be addressed.
Indeed,
I re-emphasise, it should be todays' political, or REALPolitikal
priority.
But,
back, to the 2013 federal election ishoooozzz....
Rudd
went down, as I say down the page, purely because of mining and land
ownership issues, involving no less than a bloody cold-hearted
Chinese metals industry, with or without the Chinese government
pushing it, seeing as some parts of Chinese industry is now
“privatized”.
Possibly
the cruelest “irony” (talking iron ore exports) is that China
rose so quickly in development and general growth, for having sound,
scientific land laws, and thus revenue-collection (taxation) laws, a
la “Land Rent for Government Revenue”, introduced by the
IMF-created Mao Tze Dong Communist regime and before, from an
early 20th century Chinese Revolutionary I think, (my
memory may not be correct here) one Sun Yat Sen (?).
Exactly
the same basic “Most Honest Tax” (unquote, John Winston
Howard, Australian extreme right
wing Liberal party prime minister from 1996-to-2007)
Principles that Rudd and the ALP tried to introduce in early 2010, on
the recommendations of Treasury head, Ken Henry's 2009 tax review.
China
has relatively recently opened the land market to private ownership,
thus to buying and selling land privately, but long after they
achieved the growth they have, helped up by land tax for government revenue.
I
speculate and suggest that the main reason China has opened up the
real estate “Pandora's Box” is one, because it's clearly
pretty-much an unstoppable trend elsewhere, fostered by the world's most powerful and wealthy nations', or perhaps more by those nations' wealthiest landowners, predominantly Freemasons ("G'Day Cuz!!") because China is now more than ever, a
divided-class society, with the most influential being the largest numbers
of inherited-wealth multimillionaires, but also because, with their
opening political, trade and travel doors to the world, so they've
allowed their own “second generation wealth- inheritance
princelings” to demand this unwholesome speculation on land.
To
my mind, a backward step. But hey,
“Amoeba-to-Empire-to-Self-Extermination” is not exclusive
to the white, western lost tribes of Israel!
Enough!
Now to late thoughts from last night...,
Its
doomsville for the party having any leader holding anything near
these figures Gillard v Rudd have.
Policy
remains the issue, even over my line that 2013 9-14 will be a
vote on media performance.
Rudd
was romping in the 2007-2009 years for the punters knew he was going
the big land tax issue, & other heavy decisions and reforms.
Not
forgetting of course, the tired Howard govt factor.
Perhaps
its merely that he's so bloody Catholic, and that white Australia &
Bleck, is too, that keeps Rudd in favor?
I
hate that, unnerstandably, one would hope.
So
if Gillard can't stand up and be direct, strong and open on policies
- the BIG policies Rudd led with to the '07 victory and
beyond, (and lets not forget all the ALP, Greens, Indies and their
voters who backed him, not because of it being him, but because they
all put in to scribe the electorate's favorite policy "wish-list"),
then in a perfect world, Gillard would say "Right! My role,
holding the team afloat through the mining and Murdoch
anti-Rudd-led-Reforms media storm of 2010, & of keeping the steam
up, to now, has worked, but the party AND the minority coalition
ALP-Greens-Indies government must not, cannot and should not go on
with such divided leadership loyalties."
The
current line-up with Greens and Indies is not a failure like Abbort,
Ho Jockey and Prissy Pineoclean say. (notice how Pyne is appearing
more rat-like, more forceful, more aggressive?)
But
it, the current government line-up, cannot endure or grow stronger
with the, with any, leadership division as it is.
Gillard's
as good as any woman for the job.
But
we are a nation that needs men ready to fight hard. And its not
going to get any easier.
Rudd
though, ain't any leathered-hyde Ocker.
Gillard
shouldn't have to deal with what clearly is our beliefs on male v
female in the shitpit of fed or lesser parliament. Nor should she
have to be ever-conscious of that across the electorate.
She
can give better than all of the opposition, purely for her
much-advanced Intellect, and can take whatever they, in their
“short-pants” mentalities, throw.
But,
my expressed, unashamed misogyny aside, I just don't believe
Australia is best having a female PM.
It
may suit nations not so "hard yakka".
But
our psychology says a national workforce with men doing heavy and
hard muscle work, so much of it the backbone of industry and income,
"deserve" someone closer to their perspective and/or equal,
to be calling the shots.
This
is exactly the rift between Workers and "toffs".
Labouring
in filthy noisy dangerous jobs is not the place for women.
So
those blokes need a "boss" who's been there, & who
understands what it actually takes, etc.
It
might be just gender-psychology. But either gender is distant to the
other in identifying in such situations.
And
there's nothing more irritating for men, than a woman being
"superior", because the men are doing tough rough dirty
hard jobs so she can ride the easy gravy train, and, as is so often
known by men, that away from them, the females mock them.
Gillard
doesn't seem to me to be that low kind of egotripping woman at all.
Again, her intelligence lifts her well above that level of “women's
revenge” type of thinking.
But
the egomania which comes to the fore in the clearly dysfunctional
egocentric white Australian women, when a woman takes such as the
prime minister's seat, augers a totally inappropriate and even
demonic attitude from the most of them, towards men.
Especially
men doing the hard yakka.
They
don't expect women to be under the truck, down the mine, or such.
But it IS important that there is some real understanding from and
for their level or side.
No.
Rudd's never been nor is he gonna be near a “toughie”. But it is
also a gender-specific psychological thing. Most blokes connect
better in work-politic issues. The same as women do.
Nevertheless....
The
opposition are a rude, insulting farce, no matter who leads.
(Apologies to Mal Turnbull!)
Besides,
the less political, more economic and basic commercial realities, as
well as the underlying facts of the political and economic sciences,
stand more clearly than ever shouting worldwide that the
self-interest of right wing laizze faire politico-economics is over,
that capitalism is as good as dead.
Once
this is seen, understood and accepted by the full spectrum of the
masses, from the lower to at least the middle-upper classes, the
political right, & its dwindling funds-base, the
bullshit-corrupt-laws-dependant mega-rich, is useless, and
will survive, only in truth, on the surface, ie., only by dent of
their paid-up right wing media, the malingering greed-junkies of such
as the wealth-media and their terminally damaged - king hit -
religious cults and feeder schools.
But
the masses, ranging across said lower-middle, middle-upper classes,
knowing better the falsities of everything behind the right wing
wealthy party propaganda, will, should stop supporting the political
right, and more wisely and voluntarily back a People-First Policy
Teams.
This
of course, should be happening across the crisis-ridden world, with
"austerity governments" in all western nations forcing
people to think hard and/or rethink preferences, and to seriously
explore the wrongly-demonized options of Communist Science.
So
leadership of the party must have maximum party and polity support.
Going
to Sept with either leading on less than 60% in party backing, ain't
good enough.
Clearly
Gillard has steered the minority well, but cannot get minimum 60%
party support, nor my asserted minimum of 65% popular support, to
justify staying as party leader, thus as PM.
From
here on, if she and her cabinet supporters think they must stay, the
very least they must do is take on mining and media head-on and at
full-throttle.
There
are questions have to be answered on why in 2010, ALP media campaigns
didn't happen, making clear the reasons for the various major
policies, and that talked simple FACTS straight and true, like it was
put in the SBS TV doco on mining, "Dirty Business", on
the real reasons Labor and Rudd suffered the right wing media blitz,
after they showed favor for the most honest "Henry Tax Review"?
Saachi
and Saachi making the rules again, aye?
If
the offshore right can afford the huge discrediting ad campaigns, 99%
of it outright lies, then correct ad campaigns and media and
parliamentary counter-blitzes should be easy, and massively cheaper.
They
have 7 months to win the punters back.
Whomever
is in the chair by September, shouldn't matter.
It's"Policy".
And
beneath all Best Policy, is the bedrock of Good Law.
Law
is God.
Without
Good Law, everything becomes a shitfight.
So
because disparate emphasis is put on leader gender and personality
issues, we all have to learn new LEGAL political ways of thinking.
And
so again I come back to everyone looking beyond leaders, to the
fundamental issue of "Law"!
Get
the Law right, and all political and other divisions become
unnecessary and irrelevant.
The
trick is finding The Committee of Seasoned, Wise, Righteous
REALPolitik Warriors to help the masses unnerstand and accept
it.
The
austerity measures being adopted across the western world and
further, also tell us to reduce our untenable consumption habits.
Indeed,
how many now suffering under Eurape's, Britain's, America's and other
nations' “austerity measures” realize that they have had to
impose them precisely because of their nations' rampant
over-consumption, brought on for their quite unethical plundering of
the people's they invaded and colonized, in centuries passed?
The
HARD Scientific, Economic FACTS, or, the perennial Physical LAWS of
life, show that such expansionism cannot endure, and as now, always
brings on local, and global disaster.
So,
looking at REALOptions....,
Good
Communist Government would reduce our untenable consumption, purely
by correcting the ridiculously inefficient, wasteful trends, so that
we can live more efficiently, by deeper, Wiser, co-operative sharing
of the wealth.
Again,
that all comes down to resting upon Good, True Laws.
Wealth
is worthless, if you have to work and live - and grow old and die -
with psychopaths in a warzone, to acquire and enjoy it.
Those
oligarchs rolling in riches, amidst the era's filth of inequity,
waste and war, have seriously lost the plot of Happiness and Being
Human.
To
the point of being dangerously mentally ill.
A
True and Good Government would find it easy to point this out to the
People, and win their undying allegiance.
O!
And Chris Pyne is a psychopath. He needs treatment.
But,
that's right wing “richness-sickness” politics for yer!
And
the Legal cat, has claws!
JUST DEFIANCE
Gunai
Aborigine Outlaw
Australia.
All
Praise the Immortals!
All
Praise the Warriors who have fallen
Fighting
for a Just World!
from
the Traveling 4x4 Tent of
JUST
DEFIANCE
aka
GENERAL
BLUE MEANEE
aka
Max Earth
Anchor,
for
Outlaw Junction
GLOBAL
Advocating
Land,
Tax,
Housing,
Family,
Agricultural,
Cult,
Drug,
Work,
Education
&
Environmental
LAW
REFORM
