160116 Earth moves slowly toward
Laws Impartial
This
news from Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/01/15/445903/Israel-Netanyahu-Sweden-Wallstrom-ICC-Palestinians-Israel-lobby/
out of Iran, about
the Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom's call for a probe into
Israel's “extra-judicial executions” of Palestinians, and her
assessment about the world moving away from support of Israel's
general hubris, if correct, if accurate, may be signing that we as a
species, are moving “law” from the previous “partiality” to
the preferred and only true, “Impartiality”?
Maybe?
“Law”, that is
“TRUE Law”, is always impartial.
If “laws” are
partial, then in truth, they are not “Laws”, but are corruptions.
However, while
innumerable legal experts over thousands of years, have known this,
and fought tirelessly for that hallowed “impartiality” in laws,
they've known too, that this is more the Ideal, than any achievable
reality. Then.
“Laws” have
(almost) always been constructed by “the winners”, as history has
almost always been written by “the victors”, etc.
Monarchs and
dictators, tyrants or not, have know that they do have some
responsibility toward their own positions, so laws made on their
watch are necessarily in their favour, to broadly or not,
“acceptable” degrees.
This has been how
the species, locally and globally, has developed and evolved, in
terms of the expression of “Principles” which are made into
“laws”.
In this fast 21C
age, connected globally like never in history, all these established
and often wise “laws” are up for review, whether the monarchs or
dictators or overlords like it or not.
Never before, have
we all had to view “life” and our own local, national cultures,
and lifestyles from that broadest “global” perspective.
And when we do
look, we find, uncomfortably for the spoiledbratwest, and spoiled
upper classes of all nations, that many of our happy “traditions”
and “traditional” laws, are simply untenable, when tested on the
global scales of justice.
Transgressions
of Impartial, Perennial _planetary_ Environmental Laws, the biggest
toughie most 1st
worlder's struggle to come to terms and comply with.
So too, do these
age-old “givens” of local or national laws being found to not be
at all acceptable for a greater, more interactive human population.
Israel's crazy and
totally unacceptable “laws” and assumed rights wrought from them,
about the mass-murder of Palestinians, did once pass scrutiny.
Mainly because
“law” was from time immemorial in the hands of most often biased,
“partial” lawmaking monarchs and dictating descendants of
previous warlords.
Warlords who
gained their high chairs from the very same massacring of innocents
on land they deemed as good for them to claim, in times when news was
rarely spread, facts of atrocities were either censored to dust, or
rewritten to – suit the victors.
Each neighboring
kingdom or such, was happy to ignore the carnage, as long as the
murderers left them alone, or partied with them.
But, like never
before, techno-communications have opened up the can of worms, the
Pandora's Box perhaps, for all to see, review, ponder and hurt over,
when news of an atrocity against innocents breaks.
Righteous
commentators and experts weigh the rectitude, legitimacy and
implications of a murderous transgression of common Ethical standards
(as much as “Ethical standards” ARE “common” today?), and are
free and correct to comment and put their points, against the
criminals.
It is seen by the
more Honorable News Media and publicised, which is online for
millions, hundreds of millions, to read, and weight for themselves.
Thence Movements
for Righteous Actions begin.
Thence, awry,
fanatical regimes like, perhaps, Israoil's, are put under the
spotlights and under the microscope of “impartial” legal
standards, and aspirations.
So, times DO
change!
And now, with all
the horror stories and dim prospects for any less warlike future,
from the Common Folkses who read these types of articles online, and
maybe in mainstream paper dailies, up to nation's politicians, as in
Sweden's Foreign Minister, but the myriad others who (he wrote, in
unusual optimism) retain those higher hopes and commitments to GOOD
Law, as-in IMPARTIAL Law, the ideal of Impartiality in Law, draws
ever-closer.
And surely, if
ever there is a need for that to become THE Law, it is into the
fanatical zionist regimes that it must penetrate?
That, is what
Government, is actually about.
Impartiality. A
fair deal, for everyone!
Great!
Now, about Mr
Julian Assange, Foreign Minister Wallstrom.....?
Need we say
more...?
Britain?
New Scotland Yard?
“Impartial Law”?
And couldn't I
keep going on this lovable topic!
JUST DEFIANCE
REALPolitik Outlaw
ULURUBA
