United States admits tackling Italians over payments to the Taleban
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6878547.ece
October 17,2009.
Doing my pathetic best to get to the underbelly of the war in Afghanistan, the connections I assert exist between NATO forces and the Eurapean and north American heroin trade, and why the war should be called-off and why the world should change the global laws which make drugs like heroin illegal, I spy another article regarding the claims posted in yesterday's British news media, the “timesonline”, (and yes, I think the “timesonline” and it's print newspapers are owned by Rupert Murdoch, which puts a question-mark against my assertions that he and his elite mobs are doing what they can to keep heroin and other natural drugs illegal, because it is more profitable for their top-knobs), I follow-up by commenting, (whatever is worth reading), on today's timesonline article as titled above “United States admits tackling Italians over payments to the Taleban”.
The opening paragraph of today's “timesonline” article is thus:
“The US Government acknowledged for the first time yesterday that payment of protection money to the Taleban by Italian forces in Afghanistan was discussed by American officials and their Italian counterparts last year.”
Further into the timesonline report, it reads “Bruce Riedel who headed President Obama’s Afghanistan policy review this year but is no longer inside the Administration, told The Times that he heard allegations of the Italian payments during a trip to Paris in the last week of September (2008, I assume?). A businessman with close ties to the French Government told him that the Italians had been paying the Taleban “but had forgotten to tell us [the French]”, Mr Riedel said.”
It looks also that I incorrectly implicated Romano Prodi, Italy's PM before Berlusconi retook the office last year, for today's “Times” post says these payments or bribes occurred when Berlusconi was in government? But I can't be bothered checking to confirm if I'm right, or was wrong, or am wrong, or am generally close to being right in my accusations that Prodi is in the EXTREMELY DUBIOUS category. I maintain my position that most-all of Eurape's political class and financial elites are all mentally ill, mainly because they are today's officials of the world's most corrupt and most corrupting economies and governments.
Naturally enough all Italian officials are shouting-down these “Times” allegations, while the French Opposition, no doubt wanting every bit of publicity they can get, (as do ALL political opposition parties), are demanding an urgent explanation to parliament, etc.
The next paragraph is from the same “Times” article, which is what inspired me to jump on the wires this afternoon.
“Canada has also been forced to deny reports that its soldiers paid the enemy in Afghanistan to keep the peace. A foreign wire service quoted an Afghan Army source as saying that Canadian soldiers in Kandahar province, in the Taleban-strong south, had made payments to insurgents.”
(As with yesterday's blogpost of mine questioning the veracity of an article on the 'net from “The Australian” and “aap” news about Australians and our Cannabis usage, the words in that paragraph “A foreign wire service quoted....” is open to all manner of interpretations, and in this day of misinformation as via Murdochs media cartels and co, should be given the “WHAAH?!?” response. However...)
As I wrote in yesterday's post implicating Canada in the Euro-centred Afghanistan war and heroin trade affairs, today's “Times” article seems to verify my charges, albeit denied (as we would expect) by Canada.
The last paragraph of the Times article is thus:
“I haven’t heard of any type of payment that would be done by our troops in order to remain protected,” said Lieutenant-Colonel Chris Lemay, a spokesman with the Canadian Expeditionary Forces Command. “With the number of casualties we’ve been getting, had we paid these guys they wouldn’t be holding up their end of the bargain.”
Is it only myself who sees a serious flaw in the Lieutenant's last sentence?
To even suggest the Taliban, by not upholding their end of the (any) “bargain”, were or were not IN some sort of deal with the NATO forces, dilutes what we the readers are asked to believe; that NATO and their “allies” are actually at war against the Taliban?
I'm inclined to be thinking I'm loosing some element of my thinking and comprehending and expression skills, (I've slept poorly over the last 2000 nights!) because that last paragraph of mine is not well written, but I think, I think, the reader of this blog will understand what I'm getting at. I think?
If history were to be told accurately, and not with the “classified” rewriting etc., it has always suffered (by the “victors”), we might have a very DIFFERENT picture and story about who was behind Hitler's rise in the 1920s, '30s and '40s? This, my including Hitler and a question about the forces who lifted him to power, were I or anyone who might KNOW to divulge ALL the TRUE FACTS of the 20th century's wars, might very well bring down the powers who were behind the creation of the state of Israel, and thus, the stories about the “holocaust” which is said to have killed millions of Jews in the Nazi gas chambers, may well be found to have in some part, been a fabrication?
Personally, I accept that Jews were gassed in the death camps, and that it may have been 6 million or so.
This does not however, discount the possibility that those evil events against the “landless” yet extremely “savvy” Jews and their occult cults, was orchestrated so as to gain the worldwide reaction and sympathy for their Zionist hierarchy, more securely posited in Britain, and most every other nation and region on Earth, outside of Eurape.
Such extreme and clearly horrendous mass-killings are not beyond possibility, and are definitely not beyond possibility up there in the halls and back-rooms of 20th century world megalomania. Over the last fifty years we have seen several “holocaust” deniers sent to a torrid end for asserting that the holocaust never happened.
I do not say it never happened, but, and perhaps even more controversially, I suggest that it DID happen, but was PLANNED that way, for possibly more far-sighted benefits to the Jewish Peoples who came after?
I remember that, about ten years ago, while I was on the road, sending radical essays, then by fax and by snailmail, to Geraldine Doogue of the ABC, with one of them, written in that mode some might call “channeled”. In it, I recall writing that the two world wars of the 20th century were planned by and because the elites of Europe recognized that the changes in demography, population increase, development and “the modern age” etc, demanded a drastic move to clean-up what was by the 1910s, a crumbling European infrastructure. So wars were seen as the most “efficient” way to put in effect the changes they saw as necessary. Sewerage, and other utilities could not possibly have been updated with the designs and outdated city structures that existed across the European continent.
So, it is not impossible to consider this same line of thinking (and a line which, as callous as it appears to be, is NOT totally unreasonable), was used to bring into fruition the need for a Jewish state. Again, those who were at the forefront of such schemes, might well have considered the ensuing and ongoing carnage of post-1948 Palestinians, and of the Middle East in general, to this day, as necessary and justifiable.
I DO NOT in writing this, condone ANY slaughter of these suggested kinds. It, they, are all to be abhorred, as far as I'm concerned, even while I appear to be the CMO of the Global Forces against the Babylonian western world.
On that, this is NOT a very NICE world, to my mind. Evil is nearly everywhere. That some of the Human population has managed to live, for some number of generations, in an apparent “peace”, does NOT make this planet “Heaven”.
Purely because, for that few to live without violence, carnage and cultural or social chaos and destruction, SOMEWHERE there has had to be violence, carnage and cultural or social chaos and destruction laid upon some other population of Human Beings. And usually, as “history” can show us, that other number of People has been many times more than those who have for generations avoided the hurt.
This very point, whether we include the attempts at genocide by the old IMF, of the Australian Aborigines or not, is one MAJOR reason why I DO NOT LIKE Australian culture, and thus most Australians. The majority of us, especially those who delude themselves and others that they are “Christians”, live in disgusting delusions and denials about the REAL world, and with each little trinket and toy and drinkee-pooh they buy or consume or blithely waste, they are acting like the lowest kind of being any “Creator” could possibly bring into existence.
But, that's another story, to Hitler, and to the illegal state of Israel, and of the “war on drugs” and whether the Taliban are yet just another part of the torrid and basically evil story of Humans and their wayward track across time and the Mutha's surface.
Getting back to the Afghanistan war and the Taliban and their being paid to not chuck explosives at the western forces invading their Territories, I put it that the above rant by myself about planned carnage in Eurape etc (and let us not forget “Vietnam”, “Japan” “Korea”, “Africa” and most other parts of the world where the Eurapeans and Brits have expanded, plundered, genocided and colonized) can very well be of the same designs we read about and watch on the box news, whether in Afghanistan, Somalia, Eritrea, central America, Georgia, New York and/or Alice Springs, etal etal etal.
As I just wrote above, from the ways things appear to have been on Earth for the last long-time, it is definitely NOT the Garden of Eden.
But I guess my point is that all the fightin'-and-a-bitin' is “old kings” bullshit, set in motion by mobs of battered, bruised and if not inbred, then certainly effected by fetal-alcohol syndrome warlords, who could see no other way, but to just keep on bashing their way to a comfortable few decades before the walls finally came down on them, AGAIN. By then, they'd be dead, and the baton would be passed on to the next generation of suckers. About all the knobs with the crowns and leaders' palaces could hope for is that their actions would contribute in some way to make the world a little better for those yet to be born....?
But, it has to be said that, few of them, of the last decades, show any GENUINE Will for that, and on-the-contrary, display an evil attitude which announces, with all their mealy-mouthed hyperbola, that they really don't give a shit........!
Berlusconi , from down here, down under, and his elite pricks up there in the velvet chairs, seem to fit that bill, to a tee.......
MAY THE FORCES OF REASON AND JUSTICE RISE-UP, FROM HERE FORWARD, AND ESPECIALLY IN COPENHAGEN THIS DECEMBER!
Revolution, Comrades and Kids! Revolution!
Fuck the white elite Christian scum!
Make heroin LEGAL, and Cannabis, and Cocaine, and stop the war on non-white Christians and non-white Eurapeans!
Finally, if “timesonline” IS owned by Rupert Murdoch, “my apologies” old man!
But don't tell ANYONE “you don't know where I'm comin' from.........!”
An Aborigine Fella down Canberra way told me a few years ago, that YOU Rupert, look like YOU could have a “touch of the tar” in ya'!?
Last thing YOU'd want to consider, I expect?
Makes y' wonder what you might be owing the Bleck Fellas down here, if it was TRUE, AYE?
Expect none of them'd wanna own ya though!
Hehehehehe.....
If I had any say, I'd say “CHANGE YOUR UPY'SELF ATTITUDE TO DRUGS, AS YOU PUT IN Y' MEDIA!”
I bet Jim and Lachie have had a snort or forty, in their short times!
Wouldn't even be surprised if YOU have rolled-up a shiny-new one hundred pound note over the glass top coffee table, and stuck it up ya nose, on the odd occasion, MISTA Murdoch!
As for Ber-ber-Berlusconi …......!
HA!
No comments:
Post a Comment