140215 My Guardian Comment on Hillary Clinton For US Presidency
Clinton shares wisdom on being a woman in politics during discussion with daughter Chelsea and Melinda Gates at NYU
Jon Swaine in New York
theguardian.com, Friday 14 February 2014 05.41 AEST
I don't think she's any more 'evil' than the lot of US politicians.
Even John McCain [? Republican candidate a couple of elections ago] has his 'likeable' points.
Fact is, the whole US, and all 'democratic' elections are terminally corrupt, just like the ruling dynasties and the masses.
HRC is far better for the job than Sarah Palin. But aside from any valid points, I think women cannot expect they'll be any more effective than any men, in the most evil halls of power, nowadays?
It's utter rubbish that they lobby and campaign on their being women, as better or 'it's time' for a woman to step up.
A complete, and I say, dangerous move by such as the USA to manipulate for a female president.
The world's only getting more unethical, no matter what and by how much the soft-headed NGO jewish and catholic women's core groups lobby and market that 'compassionate' [aka 'feminized'] NGOs and such are making the world a better place.
[The only thing NGOs do well, is provide exotic work for the surplus of over-educated middle to upper-class kiddies to fly home with a shiny CV, as +ve creds for their careers. Like 'cancer research'. It's all a church crock!]
As far as Mrs Clinton goes, I wager she's a closet 'matriarch', with anti-men hidden agendas to take power off the patriarchs.
Not trumpeting any [any?] virtues of the patriarchs of the last ? 6,000 ? western years, but the last thing the world needs is a gender war for global control.
Power, sadly, up that high, requires the type who can take an actual smack to the jaw, and give one or more back, and still be able to think and talk straight.
And I don't like knowing a woman has to deal with things like wars, and sending men, mainly men, into war. War, being a rather sizeable issue for large and powerful governments these centuries, demands a different 'thinking' to how women do, and should think. Again, not saying the 'patriarchs' of recent millennia have done so good.
Women have to have their voice, and be able to stand on their seats and shout the hell out of an argument, if the opposite is unreasonable, man or woman.
But the balance is way on the side of males in power, and trying to use the 'women's issues and rights' campaign in the USA, is 1, a deceit, and 2, will fuel greater antipathy towards women, from male dominated regimes,
3, if a woman wins in 2016, as US President, the gender everywhere will be screaming superiority down at the blokes, and hauling innocent males before the courts in huge numbers, casting us as the evil ones, and them more intelligent. Guaranteed.
Witchcraft will be off the charts and males will only have one choice. To act as deceitful and as evil as the sheilas have for - ? 6,000 years?
The only reason any woman would run for the US presidency, is egomania.
The very last thing the world needs more of.
But..., we are in 'the last days'...?
Any women who respond to this clearly misogynistic comment with derision and insult, will prove my perspective and conclusions.
KingCommo to vandaagduswel
15 February 2014 5:14am
"but just the fact that she runs for oofice is only to be applauded"
Nothing to do with the dynasty orchestrating it for her?
As for Julia Gillard. Yep! Good Chick! Intelligent, considerate, tough, AND a red head!
But wrong place for anyone with Honorable Hopes.
Women have got to change themselves, and the world in other ways.
[Being honest, perhaps one place to start?]
Politics is shit, no matter where you look in powerful nations.
Like QE2, she'd be but a 'figurehead' and useless in making right a very wrong western econo-political system.
Brayakooloong Gunai Indigenous Outlaw
All Praise the Immortals!
All Praise the Warriors who have fallen
Fighting for a Just World!
from the Travelling 4x4 Tent of
General Blue Meanee
General War Pig
Bleck - Green - Red
Wisdom - Intelligence - Honor